-
I don't think so. Stewardship is a contract. If the grandparents are not in a position to meet the contract to take the child, why should they have a right to custody? If Citizen X could prove, for example, the grandparents had some malicious intent what justice is there in any law that states the grandparents should assume custody. Likewise if
-
If citizen X does get involved by saying that the grandparents are not fit to take care of the child then there is a right to intervention then? If citizen X wants to prevent the child from going to the stewardship of the grandparents, but does not want to take charge of the child is that legit? If it is, what is to happen to the child?
-
Second question: What if there is only one set of grandparents who are alive, and willingly wish to take over the stewardship of the child. Does the child automaticaly go to the grandparent, no questions asked? For the transfer of stewardship is there any proper sort of interventionism due to this being a life and not property.
-
In the case of an infant losing both parents in an accident: assuming that natural law would dictate the next of kin, what if there were two sets of grandparents who both wanted stewardship of the child. Everything else being equal, the baby is from St. Louis, Granparents A are from California and Grandparents B are from Maine. In this case, is there
-
Hello all, I just moved to NYC a month ago. Does anyone know of any good bookstores for Austrian economics? The 3 Barnes and Nobles I visted seemed Lacking, all I could find was Hazlitt, maybe two books by Hayek, and 2 books by Thomas Woods. Any help would be much appreciated, thank you.