Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Search

  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    [quote user="notP"]Am I allowed to argue from dystopianism, or is it as irrational and the former?[/quote] It depends on what you are trying to argue. Retoppers argument is that An anarchist society cannot work. The argument he presents however can only claim that an anarchist society possibly may not prevail, not that it cannot work. You
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Thu, Dec 22 2011
  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    No No NO. As had been said numerous times, directly to Retopper on numerous occasions. Appeals to tradition and similar logical fallacies do not prove or condemn neither anarchy nor statism. What do you people have against logic? History is a poor tool for proving anything. Theory helps us analyze the data we record prior to recording. We don't
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Wed, Dec 21 2011
  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    [quote]If this coercion thing is incalculable. Then how does an anarchist firm determine the appropriate level of funding for security ?[/quote] As has been stated numerous times... A security agency does not derive it's revenue from coercion. It does not break the fundamental principles of price calculation. Problem solved.
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Thu, Dec 15 2011
  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    [quote] faith-based[/quote] This is a retopper phrase. Also what ad hominem?
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Thu, Dec 15 2011
  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    [quote user="Daniel Muffinburg"] I thought it obvious by his use of "In sum" and "Manifestly absurd." [/quote] Haha! Manifestly absurd! That definately concludes it.
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Thu, Dec 15 2011
  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    The history here makes the title of this thread that much more LOL Daniel vs Rettoper Rettoper sideline thread Notice DMuffinburg's coment about dodiging and going off topic as it pertains to this discussion. More rettoper Just search for his name in the archives. You will see that his argument has not matured one snidget. Considering its been over
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Wed, Dec 14 2011
  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    [quote] liberal democracy which is specifically designed to limit, balance, decentralize and make transparent the elements of armed force in society with this misrepresentation[/quote] Liberal democracy. Only Rettopper uses such contradicting terms. :) This is rettoper. Your using the same argument you've used for the past year! Tireless you are
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Wed, Dec 14 2011
  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    [quote] Armed force will be used in peaceful exchange is not possible Armed force will be used if peaceful exchange is more costly than the use of armed force, and Annexation of resources will generate a positive return on investment.[/quote] The first one is empirically problamatic. The other two points have already logically been debunked countless
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Wed, Dec 14 2011
  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    Are you retopper? lol...
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Mon, Dec 12 2011
  • Re: An-caps, STOP lying to yourself!

    [quote]Name the economic input or output that you claim can't be calculated by a CMA that uses armed force to secure a valued resource?[/quote] THe inputs and outputs are exchange ratios(Prices). If you understood the least bit of what I said before you would understand that your argument ncessarily involves a massive distortion of price ratios
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by filc on Mon, Dec 12 2011
Page 2 of 340 (3398 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last ยป | More Search Options