<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>JFedako - All Comments</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/blogs/jfedako/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Democracy in a democracy</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/blogs/jfedako/archive/2007/12/04/democracy-in-a-democracy.aspx#5907</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:19:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:5907</guid><dc:creator>Attackdonkey</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;NO!.. This is bad. further more what you might should look into is where these legislators&amp;#39; kids go. and if they have corporal punishment in those private schools.??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;not saying that I know for sure. just that it would be typical. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5907" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Dog on a Job</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/blogs/jfedako/archive/2007/11/17/the-dog-on-a-job.aspx#4544</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:36:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:4544</guid><dc:creator>kdnc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I missed one point. You asked: &amp;quot;Does the libertarian jogger or walker have the right to use pepper spray as a defense even though the dogs remain on private property?&amp;quot; My response to that would be no. If the dogs remain on private property and you cross onto said property and are bitten you have made the error, not the dogs, and you are responsible for that. The dogs and their owner have the right to protect their private property. You ignore that right at your own risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4544" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The Dog on a Job</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/blogs/jfedako/archive/2007/11/17/the-dog-on-a-job.aspx#4542</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:24:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:4542</guid><dc:creator>kdnc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The libertarian has the right to self-defense. If you can reasonably expect to be harmed, then you have a right to defend yourself. You do not have to wait until you have been harmed before you mount a defense. However, if you have seen the dogs repeatedly rush toward the fence and stop every time you might ought to be more hesitant to use counterforce. If the dogs advance farther than normal toward you then all bets are again off as you have no way of knowing if they will restrain themselves and you are again within your rights to use force to defend yourself. The question hinges on one thing: under any given set of circunstances, could a reasonable person expect physical harm to themselves or their property? If the answer is yes, then you have the right to mount a denfense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4542" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>