Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Doubt from Human Action!

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 1 Reply | 1 Follower

Top 200 Contributor
Male
390 Posts
Points 7,705
Prashanth Perumal posted on Thu, May 14 2009 7:47 AM

I found these lines in Mises' Human Action: "A bank can never issue more money-substitutes than its clients can keep
in their cash holdings. The individual client can never keep a larger portion
of his total cash holding in money-substitutes than that corresponding to the
proportion which his turnover with other clients of his bank bears to his total
turnover."

What does Mises mean? Do help me!

  • | Post Points: 20

All Replies

Not Ranked
16 Posts
Points 200
S.N.P replied on Thu, May 14 2009 8:55 AM

Since non-clients won't accept the money-substitues, or if they do, will make good on the claim and trade them in for gold immediately, the bank must have that proportion of exchanges that its clients makes with non-clients in reserve. If everyone was a client of the same bank, that bank could in theory have a 0% reserve since no-one would have any need of the actual money (ignoring any industrial uses of the money).

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS