Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

cyber freedom

rated by 0 users
This post has 7 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 150 Contributor
Posts 659
Points 13,990
ama gi Posted: Sat, Dec 5 2009 1:19 AM

There is no doubt that the Internet is the best way to circulate anti-State propaganda.  I want to keep it effective for that purpose.

Obviously, certain people do not.  While we enjoy First Amendment protections in the United States, China and the Middle East are sorely lacking in online freedom.  Moreover, our own Internet freedom is jeapardized when we do not take precautions to prevent increased surveillance and censorship.

So what shall we then do?  I use GPL-licensed software as much as possible.  Microsoft cannot be trusted.  I use linux.  Given that Google calls the shots in the development of the Firefox web browser, I prefer to use Galeon.  I use search engines that do not store personal data on users: ixquick.com and yauba.com.  ixquick.com lets you search using ssl encryption so ISP's don't see what you're doing.  Yauba.com also has a proxy service that lets your browse anonymously.  Skype rats out their Chinese users to the government, so I use Ekiga.

I'm still not satisfied with Ekiga.  Ekiga, even though it is open-source, uses the SIP protocol, which routes messages through servers instead of client-to-client.  I wish that there was an instant-message protocol that sent messages client-to-client, encrypted, and disguised as port-80 HTTP web traffic.  Unfortunately, no such IM protocol yet exists.

Finally, there is the possibility that somebody might shut down the major ISP's in wartime or some other "emergency".  Think kill-switch.

So what we need are decentralized routing algorithms that can run on modified wireless equipment.

This can achieve unregulated wireless communication links as long as 180 miles which can be used for voice communications, text chat, or independent news releases.

"As long as there are sovereign nations possessing great power, war is inevitable."

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 396
Points 5,565

1000 decentralized online liars and cheats compared to a few??

i expect the govt could take over  or shoot the satellites as well.

learn gangsta hand signals and shooting techniques if it comes to other emergency.

 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 3,592
Points 63,685
Sieben replied on Sat, Dec 5 2009 7:24 AM

sthomper:

1000 decentralized online liars and cheats compared to a few??

i expect the govt could take over  or shoot the satellites as well.

learn gangsta hand signals and shooting techniques if it comes to other emergency.

No. The OP is right. We need to have some way independent of the government to organize, otherwise we would stand no chance.

 

Banned
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 659
Points 13,990
ama gi replied on Sat, Dec 5 2009 4:33 PM

Snowflake:
No. The OP is right. We need to have some way independent of the government to organize, otherwise we would stand no chance.

Ideas, anyone?

"As long as there are sovereign nations possessing great power, war is inevitable."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 170
Points 3,275
Arvin replied on Sat, Dec 5 2009 4:51 PM

ama gi:

Snowflake:
No. The OP is right. We need to have some way independent of the government to organize, otherwise we would stand no chance.

Ideas, anyone?

Telepathy obviously. I have already invented it, so it's good to go. Only thing is, I can't afford a patent, so I won't be presenting it, because I fear someone else will patent my invention. No, but seriously, I do not think secrecy or stuff like that is going to help us. The internet is poweful because it is easy to use, and everywhere. Sure, there is some value in building a network that isn't dependant on government in case something goes wrong. But right now, we need to educate poeple and bring them to our cause. If we bring enough people to our cause, government will not be able to touch the internet in fear of retaliation. As it stands, I think they're already afraid of touching it. Even with things like IPRED in the EU and so on. Keep on spreading information publically, don't be afraid, arm yourselvesif you can!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,552
Points 46,640
AJ replied on Sun, Dec 6 2009 5:31 AM

Once the wireless networks get thick enough, I think the net will be impossible for anyone to dismantle, other than through some kind of massive electromagnetic pulse.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,538
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Sun, Dec 6 2009 1:48 PM
The wireless networks will never get 'thick enough' (physics...) and they can be easily shut down anyway.

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 414
Points 6,780

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (8 items) | RSS