I guess what I want is empirical evidence or the 'argument from effect'. I've read somewhere that most anti-trust suits are filed by fascist corporations/big business. It makes sense from the standpoint of 'regulatory capture'(This is Chicago, I don't know the Austrian argument though) theory but I don't have the evidence.
I'm not sure if there is an actual list somewhere (anyone knows of one or willing to make one?), but checking the posts on Mises.org blog will yield quite a few examples - look especially on Kinsella's posts and e.g. from Jeffrey Tucker.
Mises Wiki | Economic Resources and Books (search engine)
Read the Supreme Courts decision in U.S. v. EC Knight Company in 1895. I had a list of cases, but I can't find my old Constitutional Law syllabus.
Also check DiLorenzo in the archives of the "Myth of the Monopoly" or something like that.
This might be of some help.
Clayton -
Check Dominick Armentano's Anti-Trust & Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure.
============================
David Z
"The issue is always the same, the government or the market. There is no third solution."
Is this in regards to the Intel anti-trust?
The fact that it couldn't possibly do anything to improve competition is the evidence. If it isn't helping, it's harming.