Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

22 Seals in Bin Laden Unit Die - 8/6/11

rated by 0 users
This post has 7 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580
limitgov Posted: Sat, Aug 6 2011 10:49 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/08/06/afghanistan.nato.helicopter.crash/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

The majority of the Navy SEALs who died belonged to the same covert unit that conducted the raid that killed Osama bin Laden in May, though they were not the same men, the military official said.

 

Could the top brass be trying to kill off Seal witnesses that could give us a different story than the "government" story of how Bin Laden died?

 

 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 550
Points 8,575

Could the top brass be trying to kill off Seal witnesses that could give us a different story than the "government" story of how Bin Laden died?

No.

"People kill each other for prophetic certainties, hardly for falsifiable hypotheses." - Peter Berger
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,612
Points 29,515

I doubt it. 

The suspiscion, for me, is around the helicopter that was destroyed that night.  There may have been deaths there and supposedly those were the soldiers that would have gone in and brought bin Laden out.

"The Fed does not make predictions. It makes forecasts..." - Mustang19
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Sun, Aug 7 2011 12:32 AM

Members of SEAL Team Six are all made men. They would never "squeal." Also, they are costly to recruit and train and come with extremely scarce natural skills (a tendency toward sociopathy being among the requisite natural skills). They are not disposable bullet-stoppers. It seems like there was probably some kind of funny business that night. If there was funny business, it wasn't a bunch of SEALs that died... whoever died were simply called SEALs for public consumption. If SEALs actually died, you can rest assured it was not funny business.

Clayton -

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 33
Points 510
fbc91 replied on Sun, Aug 7 2011 2:21 AM

Clayton,

Can you expand on why you think special forces soldiers have a tendency toward sociopathy?

It definitely takes someone who isn't "normal" to make it through that kind of intense training, and 

I'm curious as to why you think these guys are slighty sociopathic.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Sun, Aug 7 2011 6:20 PM

Clayton,

Can you expand on why you think special forces soldiers have a tendency toward sociopathy?

It definitely takes someone who isn't "normal" to make it through that kind of intense training, and 

I'm curious as to why you think these guys are slighty sociopathic.

Special forces are what ordinary forces used to be (say, during the medieval era). They are professional soldiers that see more action in a month on active duty than most regular infantry will see during an entire tour-of-duty, even if they're in a battle zone. They get shot at a lot and do a lot of killing. When they retire (often long before the usual retirement age), they have a lot of options in private-sectory security at very generous salaries.

However, since States are in the business of aggression, modern special forces soldiers (including CIA/black-ops) are sometimes engaged in missions which can hardly be described as anything other than murder-for-hire. One of their own even described them as sort of like Murder, Inc. Those with the fewest moral qualms with frank assassination that may include "collateral damage" will rise to the top. In other words, the system selects for sociopathy.

Clayton -

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 76
Points 1,100
Amadeus replied on Sun, Aug 7 2011 7:16 PM

That's a subjective matter, whether they are psycopaths or not. You don't know any of them personally. 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Sun, Aug 7 2011 7:51 PM

To be more precise, I shouldn't use the blanket term 'special operations' which includes everything from Army Rangers to Marine Recon to Navy SEALs, etc. Specifically, I am talking about these kinds of folks. CIA SAD, for one, definitely has innocent blood on its hands.

Clayton -

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (8 items) | RSS