He claims Higgs was basing himself one one ambiguous paper, and ignoring many papers, which he lists as follows:
World War II Vernon - http://is.gd/bKnieu Gordon and Krenn - http://is.gd/8TL9S8 Stimulus Act Overview of nine studies - http://is.gd/UA2LeK Fryer and Sacerdote (including 50 states) - http://is.gd/tZiUgt Chodorow-Reich, Feiveson, Liscow, and Woolston - http://is.gd/Znq25z Wilson - http://is.gd/PofJmE CBO - http://is.gd/CtgyM4 Council of Economic Advisers - http://is.gd/1iW8eM Zandi and Blinder - http://is.gd/1bwqdp Oh and Reis - http://is.gd/WKQNnK Impact of provisions Zandi - http://is.gd/KtvUhn Two Surveys of economists Wall Street Journal - http://is.gd/92F2MZ USA Today - http://is.gd/MAyxIl Austrians thinking a study proves their point - http://is.gd/5tFA6J Higgs Study - http://is.gd/o9pZXo
Anyone have info on this?
My humble blog
It's easy to refute an argument if you first misrepresent it. William Keizer