Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Soviet Union resembles a monopoly

rated by 0 users
Answered (Not Verified) This post has 0 verified answers | 7 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
203 Posts
Points 5,305
TelfordUS posted on Sat, Aug 22 2009 9:45 PM

Does not the Soviet Union, whose every aspect was controlled by the government, resemble an all-powerful company? A monopoly that, through a close-knit band of powerful men, dictate all conditions within the country?

Is this, a corrupt, omnipotent union, something the first and true communists would have dreaded? Would they not realize this mockery of the name of Communism?

  • | Post Points: 80

All Replies

Top 500 Contributor
304 Posts
Points 6,045

I tend to think of state-communism as a one big-all-powerful monopoly. That's one, if not the, reason why they fail.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
515 Posts
Points 8,495
fsk replied on Sun, Aug 23 2009 12:55 PM

The USA is actually a nearly perfect implementation of Communism!  The USA has a fake free market, rather than a really free market.

I have my own blog at FSK's Guide to Reality. Let me know if you like it.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
377 Posts
Points 7,180
Ansury replied on Mon, Aug 24 2009 10:29 AM

Actually, someone who considers themselves a "true" communist would argue that the Soviet empire was not communism.  I've decided that I prefer Marxism more because most "communists" are actually referring to that it seems, rather than Soviet "communism".

Marxists seem to want the abolition of private property.  Of course, we already know how that turned out for the pilgrims... not that any Austrian economist couldn't have predicted it anyway.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
1,687 Posts
Points 22,990
Bogart replied on Mon, Aug 24 2009 11:43 AM

No, it is a government.  Only governments can sponsor monopolies.  An company apart from the government can only depend on its customers.  A company who has government protectiion in the upkeep of a monopoly is simply part of the government or will at some time be a part of the government.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
3,011 Posts
Points 47,070

Given that governments are monopolist, and given the overarching monopoly of the communist state: the USSR was a monolithic monopoly.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
390 Posts
Points 7,705

TelfordUS:
Is this, a corrupt, omnipotent union, something the first and true communists would have dreaded? Would they not realize this mockery of the name of Communism?

Bolsheviks like Lenin actually had sympathy for a 'free market'. You can refer to Lenin's Imperialism to know more. In the book, Lenin points out to some period in the 19th century which according to him was a really free economy without monopoly nuisance; but that which didn't last long, mainly because of the bankers-politicians nexus.

There are many essays of Lenin which wanted democratic workers' councils handling production.

The Soviet Union was far away from anything Lenin dreamt of!

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
13 Posts
Points 125
Mangix replied on Mon, Aug 24 2009 12:12 PM

i've heard that the Soviet Union was only Soviet for the first 4 years(1917-1921). After that, Lenin started allowing private property or something to that effect.

 


 

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (8 items) | RSS