Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Krugman: Strong-dollar policies have racial motives

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135
John James Posted: Tue, Aug 30 2011 11:52 AM

A very well-done article from RealClearPolitics...surprised I didn't see it sooner:

Paul Krugman Pulls the Race Card from the Deck's Bottom

By John Tamny

[...] But last week it's fair to say that Krugman truly stepped over the line. While his droolings are always worth an uneasy laugh combined with horror that some actually take him seriously, his assertion that there's a racial element behind the drive to achieve a strong, stable dollar was just too much. Krugman should be ashamed, though that ascribes to him a level of self-awareness that he apparently doesn't possess.

In suggesting that stable-dollar advocates are racists eager to "seek votes from Southerners angered by the end of legal segegration" as a way of returning to "the antebellum era", Krugman unsheathed the proverbial race card from the deck's bottom, and this is despicable even by his already gutter-level standards.[...]

Furthermore, DiLorenzo, and Paul are libertarians, and to know libertarians is to know that they viscerally despise the notion of slavery for it violating our basic rights as human beings. Libertarians then take it further in noting that those who enslave others develop within themselves indolent qualities that reduce their own productivity, not to mention that work without reward (something lost on Krugman given his support for nosebleed rates of taxation) always leads to reduced output. To ascribe racism to libertarians is to reveal an impressive misunderstanding of the philosophy. [full story]

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,485
Points 22,155
Kakugo replied on Wed, Aug 31 2011 2:34 AM

OK, let's stop a minute. Did they really award a Nobel Prize to this chap? Really? What? You also tell me they gave one each to Al Gore and to Barack Obama, both for Peace? I bet Friedrich Hayek, Albert Schweitzer and Linus Pauling are all rolling in their graves. I thought the Nobel Prize was awarded to the best and brightest in each field not to crooks with good connections... blush

Together we go unsung... together we go down with our people
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,417
Points 41,720
Moderator
Nielsio replied on Wed, Aug 31 2011 7:50 AM

The Nobel in Economics is not an original Nobel, but one given away by the central bank of Sweden.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

Those Wacky Swedes

(It's not really a Nobel Prize)

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 645
Points 9,865
James replied on Wed, Aug 31 2011 8:35 AM

Krugman is not really an economist, for that matter.

Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,008
Points 19,520
Eric080 replied on Wed, Aug 31 2011 8:57 AM

"All humans have the right to own the fruits of their labor and any expropriation of their labor by another is exploitative and coercive!" = Run of the mill libertarian.

 

"You're in favor of slavery."  - Krugman.

 

Ok, so he only implied that gold-standard advocates were racist and not in favor of slavery, but he insinuated enough about returning to the "antebellum era."

"And it may be said with strict accuracy, that the taste a man may show for absolute government bears an exact ratio to the contempt he may profess for his countrymen." - de Tocqueville
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS