Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Choose my next book to read

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 212
Points 3,790
Chris Posted: Thu, Dec 17 2009 10:17 PM

After Tuesday my winter break from school will start (thankfully).  So now that I will be free from college for a bit I can actually start learning useful material again.  I consider myself to be intermediate in Austrian Economics and I have a few books here I haven't read yet - MES (Rothbard), Money, Bank Credit & Economic Cycles (DeSoto), and The Pure Theory of Capital (Hayek).  Realistically I will only be able to finish one of thse books during the time I have for break - what do you guys think?  I have read plenty of Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, and a bunch of other books here; would MES be too "beginner" at this point (yeah I kinda worked backwards I've read 5 other Rothbard books but not this one yet)?  I will read all of them eventually, but 2 will have to wait until after the spring semester. Which one should I read first?

- Chris

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,511
Points 31,955

De Soto's Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles. Hayek's Pure Theory of Capital is notoriously dense, and deservingly so.

Abstract liberty, like other mere abstractions, is not to be found.

          - Edmund Burke

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,651
Points 51,325
Moderator
krazy kaju replied on Thu, Dec 17 2009 10:48 PM

I agree with lam. Also, MES is probably too beginner for you at this point.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 166
Points 2,875
Beefheart replied on Thu, Dec 17 2009 11:27 PM

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles.

My personal Anarcho-Capitalist flag. The symbol in the center stands for "harmony" and "protection"-- I'm hoping to illustrate the bond between order/justice and anarchy.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,943
Points 49,130
SystemAdministrator
Conza88 replied on Thu, Dec 17 2009 11:44 PM

Chris:
would MES be too "beginner" at this point (yeah I kinda worked backwards I've read 5 other Rothbard books but not this one yet)? 

What are the other ones? They'd deal more with Libertarianism though, wouldn't they?

I'd suggest MES before DeSoto.

Ron Paul is for self-government when compared to the Constitution. He's an anarcho-capitalist. Proof.
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,649
Points 28,420

Economics sucks. Read something else if it isn't clear where to go.

Democracy means the opportunity to be everyone's slave.—Karl Kraus.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 212
Points 3,790
Chris replied on Fri, Dec 18 2009 12:43 AM

Conza88:

Chris:
would MES be too "beginner" at this point (yeah I kinda worked backwards I've read 5 other Rothbard books but not this one yet)? 

What are the other ones? They'd deal more with Libertarianism though, wouldn't they?

I'd suggest MES before DeSoto.

Other ones by Rothbard I've read:  What has Government done to our Money, Mystery of Banking, History of Money and Banking in the US, America's Great Depression, Education Free/Compulsory.  As I said before, I am going to eventually read all three of the books sitting on my shelf unread (I buy a lot at one time and read them over a year usually) but I am just curious as to what order everybody here would recommend.  I've already read Human Action so I am not sure if MES would be more of a refresher for that (in which case I'd read it in the spring or summer) or if I would stand to learn a lot of new things from it.  Thanks your all your suggestions so far.

- Chris

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,687
Points 48,995

The Pure Theory of Capital will take more than a couple of weeks, as you will definately have to take notes.  Books like de Soto's are easier to read (even though it's still good to take notes), so you can understand it without having to re-read it and whatnot.  I have not read or looked at MES, so I don't know about that one (I still need to buy it; I get paid tomorrow, so I might buy it then).

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 212
Points 3,790
Chris replied on Fri, Dec 18 2009 2:07 PM

Jonathan M. F. Catalán:

The Pure Theory of Capital will take more than a couple of weeks, as you will definately have to take notes.  Books like de Soto's are easier to read (even though it's still good to take notes), so you can understand it without having to re-read it and whatnot.  I have not read or looked at MES, so I don't know about that one (I still need to buy it; I get paid tomorrow, so I might buy it then).

My break is a month long Smile I don't think there would be a snowball's chance in hell I could read MES in two weeks haha.  Thanks for your suggestions.  I know, at least in my opinion, Hayek is a bit difficult to read (takes me a while to get through his writing with a full understanding).  After reading Prices, Production, and Other Works I realized Hayek didn't exactly make for light reading.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,687
Points 48,995

Chris:

After reading Prices, Production, and Other Works I realized Hayek didn't exactly make for light reading.

I want to write an article for Wikipedia on Richard Cantillon, so I am focusing on reading stuff relevant to him, but afterwards I want to start reading some "heavy" literature.  I'm not sure if I should read Prices and Production or Pure Theory of Capital first.  I have read de Soto's book (although, I will have to re-read it and take notes), but I want to get through all the big Austrian works: Human Action, Prices and Production and Man, Economy and State.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 212
Points 3,790
Chris replied on Fri, Dec 18 2009 2:32 PM

Jonathan M. F. Catalán:

Chris:

After reading Prices, Production, and Other Works I realized Hayek didn't exactly make for light reading.

I want to write an article for Wikipedia on Richard Cantillon, so I am focusing on reading stuff relevant to him, but afterwards I want to start reading some "heavy" literature.  I'm not sure if I should read Prices and Production or Pure Theory of Capital first.  I have read de Soto's book (although, I will have to re-read it and take notes), but I want to get through all the big Austrian works: Human Action, Prices and Production and Man, Economy and State.

Human Action and Prices, Production, & Other Works are both excellent.  The latter was heavy reading although some essays were easier to read than others in the book.  After just skimming through The Pure Theory of Capital I'm thinking I should have read that first but I still think I got a lot out of reading Prices, Production, & Other Works. 

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS