Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Is thinking considered to be action?

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 3 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 500 Contributor
276 Posts
Points 4,320
bcyclwutztht posted on Fri, Nov 5 2010 10:42 PM

I mean thinking as in the mental development of an idea---like thinking of a story to write in a book, or thinking of music and lyrics so some housewife can be sued one day by record companies for $millions because she downloaded your music. 

Would it be treated as consumption of leisure?

  • | Post Points: 35

All Replies

Top 200 Contributor
430 Posts
Points 8,145

Is action limited to physical movement of body parts? I don't think so. It certainly does involve the firing of neurons, anyhow.

But thinking is certainly purposeful, if that's what you mean by action. It's acting with an end in mind, like increased knowledge, or wealth, or health, und so weiter.

“Remove justice,” St. Augustine asks, “and what are kingdoms but gangs of criminals on a large scale? What are criminal gangs but petty kingdoms?”
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Male
35 Posts
Points 565

"like thinking of a story to write in a book"

you seem to have answered your own question here.

Are you choosing to do this (instead of something else with your time)?

 

Would it be treated as consumption of leisure?

in the examples you are describing developing ideas: producing them. Your brain is expending energy to create these ideas. You are describing what people typically call working (professional authors and songwriters for instance).

 

'like thinking of lyrics for a song you are currently writing'

is this an action?

'like thinking of lyrics for a song you are currently listening to'

is this an action?

'like thinking of a story'

is this an action?

'like thinking (of X)'

is this an action?

 

 

why/why not?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
276 Posts
Points 4,320

Thanks.  Yea, for a second there I had slipped into the empricist's fallacy:  i.e. the only thing that counts is, literally, that which can be counted.

(You can see the economics = materialism fallacy behind the structure of my question, in that it's written from an IP-themed example of action.)    I'm glad to be back!

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS