Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Insurance, industrial disasters, and compensation

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 4 Replies | 2 Followers

Not Ranked
18 Posts
Points 495
Olav posted on Sat, Jan 15 2011 8:09 AM

Hi,

I have a question. Currently in my country there is a case where an industrial (chemical) company was burned down due to an intensive fire after an accident. Some chemical substances may have been released into soil or air and caused damage to other companies, farmers and surrounding villages and its inhabitants.

There is speculation that the insurance company may not compensate all liabilities or may not compensate at all.

So, many people who's property rights have been infaded might see any chance for compensation vanish.

How would such industrial disasters be handled in a libertarian society?

  • | Post Points: 35

All Replies

Top 50 Contributor
Male
2,209 Posts
Points 35,645
Merlin replied on Sat, Jan 15 2011 4:07 PM

 

My take,

First, why is the insurer refusing to pay? The consequences of failing to uphold a contract in a libertarian society would be harsh.

Second, find out who caused the accident. A worker? Well, he better be insured! Faulty management decisions? Well, they better be insured! No specific act is the cause? Than shareholder are responsible in full, and not only to the amount of capital they invested.

If the funds are not enough, well the local will have to take the loss. 

The Regression theorem is a memetic equivalent of the Theory of Evolution. To say that the former precludes the free emergence of fiat currencies makes no more sense that to hold that the latter precludes the natural emergence of multicellular organisms.
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
1,434 Posts
Points 29,210

There is speculation that the insurance company may not compensate all liabilities or may not compensate at all.

Same question as above. They have to compensate all liabilities, or else they've broken the contract with the aforementioned industrial/chemical company.

How would such industrial disasters be handled in a libertarian society?

The individuals harmed in the accident would be fully compensated. What's going to happen in your country, most likely, is that the government will claim ownership of some of the surrounding land, and it will give the company a break through its monopolized judicial system. That wouldn't happen in a libertarian society.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
18 Posts
Points 495
Olav replied on Sun, Jan 16 2011 3:30 AM

First, why is the insurer refusing to pay?

There are two scenarios: (1) the conditions of the insurance-contract are not met (they didn't took the precautionary actions as stated in the contract, as well as there might be other chemicals involved they weren't authorized in the insurance-contract. And (2) the insurer only insured upto a certain amount (like 15 mln eur), which is ought to be not enough.

Second, find out who caused the accident. A worker?

According to the news by an alleged transfer of chemicals by a worker in which a spark ignited the substances into a fire. In my country the company usually covers its employees with liability insurances on the working place.

The individuals harmed in the accident would be fully compensated. What's going to happen in your country, most likely, is that the government will claim ownership of some of the surrounding land, and it will give the company a break through its monopolized judicial system. That wouldn't happen in a libertarian society.

Ill watch what will happen :)

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
2,209 Posts
Points 35,645
Merlin replied on Sun, Jan 16 2011 7:12 AM

There are two scenarios: (1) the conditions of the insurance-contract are not met (they didn't took the precautionary actions as stated in the contract, as well as there might be other chemicals involved they weren't authorized in the insurance-contract. And (2) the insurer only insured upto a certain amount (like 15 mln eur), which is ought to be not enough.

Ah, that's OK than.

According to the news by an alleged transfer of chemicals by a worker in which a spark ignited the substances into a fire. In my country the company usually covers its employees with liability insurances on the working place.

If the company covers employer's liability, than it should be the shareholders who pay, but out of their own pocket. That, of course,will not happen where you live, or anywhere else for that matter. But it should...

The Regression theorem is a memetic equivalent of the Theory of Evolution. To say that the former precludes the free emergence of fiat currencies makes no more sense that to hold that the latter precludes the natural emergence of multicellular organisms.
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS