There are already plenty of sources to find out if a food product is GMO or not. We don't need the government to force GMO labelling.
To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process. Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!" Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."
I can't see what the fuss is about. Why is it so bad that food is labelled clearly?
Ends vs. means, Consumariat. Ends vs. means.
The keyboard is mightier than the gun.
Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.
Voluntaryism Forum
Unlike most regulation, I don't think this necessarily benefits big business.
The lack of GMO labeling in a free market is a reflection of consumer preferences. If it provided a competitive advantage to provide GMO labeling (if it were profitable, which is to say if consumers were willing to pay more for GMO labeling than it costs to provide GMO labeling) the market would (eventually) provide it. The fact that this has not occurred is evidence that 1. providing GMO labeling isn't profitable to producers or 2. there are legal distortions (government regulation/influence) which are preventing firms from satisfying consumer demands. In the case of the former, those that want GMO labeling are seeking the State to force their preferences on others. In the case of the latter, government regulation can be effective in fixing the problems caused by government regulation.