Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Calif. Ballots Calls for mandatory GMO Labeling on Food

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580
limitgov Posted: Mon, Oct 3 2011 8:39 AM
http://www.naturalnews.com/033763_GMOs_California_ballot_initiative.html

"In what is perhaps the most significant breaking news we've heard on the GMO front in a long time, an effort has just been announced in California that seeks to gather enough signatures to put an historical initiative on the ballot which would require the labeling of GMOs in foods. "

You guys don't like government regulation, so how could this get twisted as to benefit gmo companies like monsanto and other big food companies? or won't it?
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

There are already plenty of sources to find out if a food product is GMO or not. We don't need the government to force GMO labelling.

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 539
Points 11,275

I can't see what the fuss is about. Why is it so bad that food is labelled clearly?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590

Ends vs. means, Consumariat. Ends vs. means.

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 358
Points 8,245

Unlike most regulation, I don't think this necessarily benefits big business. 

 

The lack of GMO labeling in a free market is a reflection of consumer preferences. If it provided a competitive advantage to provide GMO labeling (if it were profitable, which is to say if consumers were willing to pay more for GMO labeling than it costs to provide GMO labeling) the market would (eventually) provide it. The fact that this has not occurred is evidence that 1. providing GMO labeling isn't profitable to producers or 2. there are legal distortions (government regulation/influence) which are preventing firms from satisfying consumer demands. In the case of the former, those that want GMO labeling are seeking the State to force their preferences on others. In the case of the latter, government regulation can be effective in fixing the problems caused by government regulation. 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580
My personal opinion is this: regulations like this will lead to big business having products that really are GMO, but will be able to labeled non-gmo for various reasons. And, of course, small businesses will be attacked by the FDA, or the USDA for labeling their products non-gmo, which will be much cleaner and purer than the factor farm products. Of course, this is just my opinion on what I predict will happen.
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS