Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

"Boom" in the "Boom/Bust" cycle

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 2 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
153 Posts
Points 3,510
nibbler491 posted on Tue, Jan 27 2009 7:14 AM

Starting off, here's an article written by david_z on the business cycle(helped me greatly in learning exactly how the business cycle worked):

http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/5365.aspx

 

Now I have a few questions. First, why is there a "boom" at all? Shouldn't entreuprenuers simply malinvest, because they THINK the consumption has gone up, while the consumption level stays at the same level? If that's true, then it would really just be a Bust. No boom involved. But then, what causes the Booms like the dotcom boom, and the Housing boom?

Second, Why is it not possible for entreuprenuers to look at the actions of the fed and discern that prices rice as a result of inflation, not of a change in time preference?

  • | Post Points: 35

All Replies

Top 10 Contributor
Male
4,985 Posts
Points 90,430

nibbler491:
Now I have a few questions. First, why is there a "boom" at all? Shouldn't entreuprenuers simply malinvest, because they THINK the consumption has gone up, while the consumption level stays at the same level? If that's true, then it would really just be a Bust. No boom involved. But then, what causes the Booms like the dotcom boom, and the Housing boom?

I don't understand what you mean. Entrepreneurs don't think consumption has gone up, they think individuals are cutting down on present consumption for future consumption. The point is that as these  entrepreneurs receive the new money and embark on these malinvestments they have to big against one another for the services of labourers, this means that wages rise and there is apparent "prosperity".

If, time preference really had decreased and all of these investments were embarked on, the economy would still appear to be prosporous, only, this time it really would.

nibbler491:
Second, Why is it not possible for entreuprenuers to look at the actions of the fed and discern that prices rice as a result of inflation, not of a change in time preference?

And how can they tell what the real interest rate is? Moreover if all of their competitors take out loans at a low interest they're going to be outcompeted, so they have to do it often, if only to be able to compete.

"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"

Bob Dylan

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
478 Posts
Points 9,180

nibbler491:
Now I have a few questions. First, why is there a "boom" at all? Shouldn't entreuprenuers simply malinvest, because they THINK the consumption has gone up, while the consumption level stays at the same level? If that's true, then it would really just be a Bust. No boom involved. But then, what causes the Booms like the dotcom boom, and the Housing boom?

Check out Roger Garrison's powerpoints on this. Note that those extra pieces of paper the central bank prints masquerade as real savings. Entrepreneurs misconstrue this as genuine demand and begin expanding. Then out comes the rug from underneath everyone's feet.

Austrians do it a priori

Irish Liberty Forum 

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS