<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Newbies</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/222.aspx</link><description>If you are just dropping in or starting out, post here</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Argument bin.</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/65710.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:17:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:65710</guid><dc:creator>Fephisto</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/65710.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=222&amp;PostID=65710</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I just wanted to collect some fairly good libertarian arguments here.&amp;nbsp; Here are some of the one&amp;#39;s I frequently use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1)&amp;nbsp; TANSTAAFL:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No explanation needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;We need free healthcare!&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;TANSTAAFL.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2)&amp;nbsp; Infallibility of the Bureaucrat Fallacy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The
idea that if we had agency X, that things would be so much better, and
yet due to the centralization caused by appointing a single agency in
charge, this isn&amp;#39;t the case.&amp;nbsp; Basically, there is an implicit
assumption that the agency will do what it was charged to do, and that
the people in charge of the agency are incorruptible individuals.&amp;nbsp; I
find this is most effective with anti-trust, since in arguing against
collectivization, they&amp;#39;ve by definition collectivized it under one
agency (just buy the copyright/buy a lawyer to get an anti-trust suit
against you&amp;#39;re competitor).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Examples:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;quot;But with private courts, the corporations could just bribe the courts!&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The same could happen with the public court, notice the singular on the word &amp;#39;court&amp;#39;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;quot;The oil agencies get far too much profit, we need regulation to keep their excessive exuberance in check.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;That way an oil company only has to bribe one man to keep all his competitor&amp;#39;s profits low.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;quot;The FCC-&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*laugh*&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3)&amp;nbsp; Pointing Out the Gun.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I
first heard this from Francois Tremblay.&amp;nbsp; Behind every government
intervention, there is coercion, point it out to gain the moral
high-ground.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;quot;We need to government to give humanitarian aid.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;So you&amp;#39;re going to point a gun at someone to give &amp;#39;humanitarian&amp;#39; aid...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>