https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/222.aspxIf you are just dropping in or starting out, post hereenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82891.aspxSat, 24 Jan 2009 05:16:29 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:82891Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82891.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=222&PostID=82891<p>Then China does not need to be competed with. It means it&#39;s already providing the most cost-effective solution for its customers. They&#39;re practically giving something for free, at least partially.</p> <p>However if you find your business failing because of that, you could just cut your production and buy what China&#39;s selling. When they run out of &quot;energy&quot; (which they&#39;ll eventually do) or simply believe they drove you off the market, you begin selling those products, getting better profits than if the dumping did not occur.</p> <p>In general, every successful company on a free market should be able to adjust its production quickly. There&#39;s no state to subsidize you and/or to regulate work contracts.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82878.aspxSat, 24 Jan 2009 04:43:06 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:82878Luis Buenaventura0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82878.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=222&PostID=82878<p>So, how do you argue with somebody who always says that even an unregulated economy can&#39;t compete with China because of the government&#39;s dumping/monetary manipulation policies?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>