Re: Hi Guys -no gender implied -New to the Forum

Stan — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 06:58:16 GMT

No insult intended. I aspire to speak to those more schooled in phylosophy than I. The comment applied to all intelectual intercourse that I see on Forums,in general, Mises not excluded.

Re: Hi Guys -no gender implied -New to the Forum

Inquisitor — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 06:24:26 GMT

And which would those "dufus's" be?

Welcome, BTW.

Hi Guys -no gender implied -New to the Forum

Stan — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 06:08:40 GMT

This is a new and exciting Forum to me. As I casually read post from all who have posted recently, I find a treasure of intelectual challenge for my pleasure and edification. I look forward to figuring out where I might fit in these many threads. If I might speak(as a guest) with some levity; At this point, I am not certain whether I am to identify with Anti-Psycologism vis-a-vis Hermeneutics as it applies to Kantian and neo-Aristotelian epistemological foundations of praexeology, or, on the other hand, recent post notably by several Dufus's, or would that be"Dufii? Ah but for the old days in Grad School!! I look forward to finding the middle ground between these two expressions of wisdom, but fear that I am only months away from joining the former, though I may in fact be more appropriately classified as the latter. I will, to your pleasure, remain quiet for the immediate future, and will then only timidly venture forth with quissical notions.

Stan

General

Re: Hi Guys -no gender implied -New to the Forum

Re: Hi Guys -no gender implied -New to the Forum

Hi Guys -no gender implied -New to the Forum