General

Re: Enviro-mental-whacko's

Ennio45 — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:33:15 GMT

"Evil" is a subjective term. It has no real meaning but that which you give it. Looking at history, the most succesful means to change has been, unfortunately, violence. It is inevitable that the enviromental movement become violent. When peaceful means fail most movements turn to violence. I don't know if ELF is communist or socialist, or what. I have met ALF members and they seemed to be more anarcho-primitivist then anything else. I don't think there are any proactive solutions that can be taken to end this violence. Reactive violence (on the part of the state/society) would simply push the enviromentalists further into extremism. Respect and honest dusussion is usually the best solution, however it may be to late for that.

Re: Enviro-mental-whacko's

Inquisitor — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:26:02 GMT

Everyone should know by now what kind of nutcases these people are.

I'd say throw them in prison for life, but unfortunately those are tax-payer funded...

Enviro-mental-whacko's

Bank Run — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:20:05 GMT

I viewed a story in the news today, about some nihilistic screwballs burnin' up new developments. Someone teach them to attack the banks, or government. Everything the government owns came through theft, the banks commit fraud and embezzelment and we the slaves of america have not a justice system, but a charade monopoly violent despotism. Here is nimrods wantin' people to do what they want them to do, and wrecking the only thing that that could help them achieve the ends of conservation, private property.

Sorry, just gettin' into Trial by Jury, and found this.

Those who are capable of tyranny, are capable of perjury to sustain it.

It is healthy to want to be a good caretaker of ones enviroment, it is evil, to use violence, and/or destruction to do this.

If folks really want to go green, they will become entrepeneurs, or capatalist pigs (some of their language). Does their new god, (t.v?), tell them that mother nature is causing them to procede in class warfare, which is always destructive.

I don't know what the future will hold, but I hope that oppressive government does not force me to teach children ethical-nihilism. Well I wouldn't be breakin' stuff myself, so ideas are criminal in this nightmare utopia too. You see, it is a childish thing to doo, break stuff if you don't like it.

Government goods are generally shotty. So the premise that public ownership of scarce goods, like capital, can do whatever 'the peoples will' wants to achieve is a failed and oppressive idealism from the start.