General

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Sieben — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:10:43 GMT

Laughing Man:
In a way they are. Religion, morals, bourgeois principles, family, non-consent from the populace, these are all just barriers to their ultimate goal. Pleasure, but not necessarily sexual pleasure psychological pleasure in planning and in the realization of power over people and their actions.

I meant what if we put them in jail for half their lives and when they got out they wouldn't do anything they wrote about.

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Andrew Cain — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:55:32 GMT

Snowflake:
If only our politicians could be more like the divine marquis...

In a way they are. Religion, morals, bourgeois principles, family, non-consent from the populace, these are all just barriers to their ultimate goal. Pleasure, but not necessarily sexual pleasure psychological pleasure in planning and in the realization of power over people and their actions.

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Saan — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:16:04 GMT

This is awesome

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Sieben — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:32:21 GMT

Laughing Man:
Bring on Philosophy in the Bedroom!

If only our politicians could be more like the divine marquis...

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Justin Laws — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:56:58 GMT

Snowflake:

Government always screws up the things it tries ... but if the government got into the sex business it would ruin that too. I almost kind of want them to nationalize sex to see how badly they can mess it up. I mean, how would you ruin sex? I bet people would support it and condemn voluntary sex? Kekeke.

it's funny you should say that... http://ifaq.wap.org/sex/sexhelp.html

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Andrew Cain — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:09:59 GMT

Snowflake:
There should be a right to... carnal relations.

Bring on Philosophy in the Bedroom!

(Please visit the site to view this media)

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Praetyre — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:29:57 GMT

Perhaps forced prostitution should be termed "national selective sexual services provision". Breeding programs can be termed as "social family planning". Mandatory sexual provision will be termed "public sexual services". This stuff really writes itself.

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

filc — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:01:27 GMT

This will artificially inflate the demand for friendship and create a friend bubble. When the bubble pops mass homicide will ensue.

I will be on my lawn with popcorn and a shotgun safely watching the whole event at a distance. Come on over and bring some beer!

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Sieben — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:16:10 GMT

Giant_Joe:
Oddly enough, that example in the distant past helped me to realize the insanity of guaranteeing universal rights to people.

Government always screws up the things it tries. I mean, its one thing to ruin education, national defense and health care, but if the government got into the sex business it would ruin that too. I almost kind of want them to nationalize sex to see how badly they can mess it up. I mean, how would you ruin sex? I bet people would support it and condemn voluntary sex? Kekeke.

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Giant_Joe — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:08:31 GMT

Snowflake:

There should be a right to... carnal relations.

Voluntary association and the free market have obviously failed to universalize this service.

Oddly enough, that example in the distant past helped me to realize the insanity of guaranteeing universal rights to people.

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Sieben — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:04:21 GMT

There should be a right to... carnal relations.

Voluntary association and the free market have obviously failed to universalize this service.

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Keith Ackermann — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:08:48 GMT

I can't help but be reminded of Bill Hicks' People Who Hate People Club.

"Are we going to have a meeting Friday?"

"No if you are going to be there."

"Damn!"

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Giant_Joe — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:42:22 GMT

The Late Andrew Ryan:

Lol. Really funny because I've been reading the "attack on reason" section of Human Action

I thought it would be a very dry book. I'm randomly reading sections from it. I usually get a really good laugh every chapter or two when I think up stuff like that. He usually provides an example of an absurdity or contradiction of some incorrect theory, and I just can't help but imagine a few more examples just because it makes me laugh. Mises is awesome.

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

The Late Andrew Ryan — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:24:27 GMT

Giant_Joe:

I prefer the right to secede from the laws of gravity be enforced. After all, that theory was constructed by the logic of a bourgeoisie, Newton, so it must be false.

Lol. Really funny because I've been reading the "attack on reason" section of Human Action

Re: There should be a Right to Friendship

Giant_Joe — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:29:14 GMT

I prefer the right to secede from the laws of gravity be enforced. After all, that theory was constructed by the logic of a bourgeoisie, Newton, so it must be false.