https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/27.aspxEverything else.enCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/318177.aspxSat, 27 Mar 2010 13:05:54 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:318177Kenneth0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/318177.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&PostID=318177<p>That&#39;s nice to know. I don&#39;t want a redundant reading. Hulsmann and de Soto are such great Austrian Scholars</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/318173.aspxSat, 27 Mar 2010 12:42:02 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:318173jtucker0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/318173.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&PostID=318173<p>Two very different books. Two different purposes. Huls is more narrow and much shorter, dealing with specific problems. de Soto is a sweeping reconstruction of macro theory in light of micro money theory. </p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317964.aspxFri, 26 Mar 2010 17:06:21 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317964Kenneth0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317964.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&PostID=317964<p>Compare and contrast. What are the similarities and what are the differences? Which is better overall? </p><div style="clear:both;"></div>