https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/27.aspxEverything else.enCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/327559.aspxTue, 27 Apr 2010 00:39:15 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:327559NewLiberty0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/327559.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&PostID=327559<p> You are right - he and Rothbard got behind Buchanan I think, even though they weren&#39;t protectionists.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/327554.aspxTue, 27 Apr 2010 00:22:45 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:327554No2statism0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/327554.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&PostID=327554<p> I was&nbsp;just wondering what other people thought.&nbsp; I thought maybe it was because Pat Buchanan decided to run, and Dr. Paul and Buchanan have&nbsp;a lot of common ground (except the death penalty and&nbsp;trade).</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>