<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/27.aspx</link><description>Everything else.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: What do you think of Professor Reisman's book 'Capitalism'?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341915.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:43:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:341915</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan M. F. Catalán</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341915.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=341915</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Can you go into detail please? How is the Ricardo effect theoretically tenable in anyway whatever?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I don&amp;#39;t agree completely with Hayek&amp;#39;s Ricardo effect, but I don&amp;#39;t agree with Reisman&amp;#39;s criticism of it, either.&amp;nbsp; I think there are elements of truth proposed by both, though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What do you think of Professor Reisman's book 'Capitalism'?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341893.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:56:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:341893</guid><dc:creator>Esuric</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341893.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=341893</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;I think Reisman is wrong on a lot of different specific points (such as his criticism of the Ricardo Effect), but overall &lt;em&gt;Capitalism&lt;/em&gt; is a very good book.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Can you go into detail please? How is the Ricardo effect theoretically tenable in anyway whatever?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What do you think of Professor Reisman's book 'Capitalism'?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341886.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:41:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:341886</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan M. F. Catalán</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341886.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=341886</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		I&amp;#39;m planning to read it before reading &amp;#39;Human Action&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Man, Economy, and State&amp;#39; so that I can start from a more mainstream perspective. What are the differences in these books, in terms of substance, style, approach to teaching economics, etc. ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	While Reisman is not explicitely Austrian, he is not &amp;quot;mainstream&amp;quot; either.&amp;nbsp; He is an Austrian &amp;quot;with Ricardian tendencies&amp;quot; (his attempt to vindicate post-Smithian classical economists was perhaps one of the main differences he and Mises had [from the introduction to &lt;em&gt;Capitalism&lt;/em&gt;]).&amp;nbsp; I think Reisman is wrong on a lot of different specific points (such as his criticism of the Ricardo Effect), but overall &lt;em&gt;Capitalism&lt;/em&gt; is a very good book.&amp;nbsp; Reisman writes one of the best critiques of Keynesian economics that I&amp;#39;ve read, although I think that his critique is a bit outdated (regarding liquidity preference).&amp;nbsp; Keynesian IS/LM theory evolved during the late 1980s and early 1990s, so that it no longer matches that put forward by Reisman (largely based on work by Hicks).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Capitalism&lt;/em&gt; is a very good book, but you can&amp;#39;t read it over &lt;em&gt;Human Action&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What do you think of Professor Reisman's book 'Capitalism'?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341884.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:50:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:341884</guid><dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341884.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=341884</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	It&amp;#39;s a responsible decision as far as buying books.&amp;nbsp; $80 on one book, or $60 for two. I&amp;#39;m not in any way bashing Reisman or &lt;em&gt;Capitalism, &lt;/em&gt;but it also makes more sense to start off with &lt;em&gt;HA&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;MES&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What do you think of Professor Reisman's book 'Capitalism'?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341865.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:21:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:341865</guid><dc:creator>I. Ryan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341865.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=341865</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Bert:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I don&amp;#39;t know anything about Reisman[...]. I don&amp;#39;t think you&amp;#39;ll be missing anything by not reading &lt;em&gt;Capitalism&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Pretty irresponsible.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What do you think of Professor Reisman's book 'Capitalism'?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341851.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:57:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:341851</guid><dc:creator>DanielMuff</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341851.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=341851</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	The book is huge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What do you think of Professor Reisman's book 'Capitalism'?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341848.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:16:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:341848</guid><dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341848.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=341848</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I don&amp;#39;t know anything about Reisman, but &lt;em&gt;Capitalism&lt;/em&gt; is $80 compared to &lt;em&gt;Human Action&lt;/em&gt; which is $20.&amp;nbsp; Just get &lt;em&gt;Human Action&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;MES&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I don&amp;#39;t think you&amp;#39;ll be missing anything by not reading &lt;em&gt;Capitalism&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>What do you think of Professor Reisman's book 'Capitalism'?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341841.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:34:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:341841</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/341841.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=341841</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I&amp;#39;m planning to read it before reading &amp;#39;Human Action&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Man, Economy, and State&amp;#39; so that I can start from a more mainstream perspective. What are the differences in these books, in terms of substance, style, approach to teaching economics, etc. ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>