<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/27.aspx</link><description>Everything else.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Energy subsidies graph</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/348158.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:33:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:348158</guid><dc:creator>Wibee</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/348158.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=348158</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	If it were feasable, I would seriously opt for a solar power set-up. &amp;nbsp;I like the idea of being in charge of my own energy. &amp;nbsp;Even if the pay-off or break even was years in the future. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Energy subsidies graph</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/348153.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:02:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:348153</guid><dc:creator>ViennaSausage</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/348153.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=348153</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	My guess is that if we truly had a free market, ie no subsidies or land restrictions, that renewables would win out in the market. &amp;nbsp;But that is just a guess.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Energy subsidies graph</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/348139.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:10:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:348139</guid><dc:creator>Wibee</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/348139.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=348139</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	http://jontaplin.com/2010/07/05/end-corporate-welfare-now/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Came across this graph at boing boing. &amp;nbsp;Did not dig deep into it, it does beg the question how economically feasable fossil fuels are without money from the government. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Then again, this should not be a problem. &amp;nbsp;The government takes more money from these companies than it gives back...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>