https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/27.aspxEverything else.enCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/424551.aspxMon, 06 Jun 2011 18:48:13 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:424551Phaedros0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/424551.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&PostID=424551<p> I dont think that&#39;s accurate at all.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/424543.aspxMon, 06 Jun 2011 17:42:32 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:424543Prateek Sanjay0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/424543.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&PostID=424543<p>Here&#39;s what I mean.</p> <p>Often for every single body of thought, most of the people or a significant portion of the people in its mold will belong to a particular professional&nbsp;background.</p> <p>Would these be atleast half-correct assessments?</p> <p>Anarchists - Artists, poets, literati</p> <p>Progressives - Washington DC wonks, technocrats, think tank researchers</p> <p>Agrarian primitivists - Writers, philosophers</p> <p>European social democrats - professors&nbsp;(in some cases, with so many degrees that they go up to Herr Professor Doktor Doktor)</p> <p>Protectionists and economic populists - self-made billionaires and plutocrats (such as Ross Perot)</p> <p>Any others?</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>