<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/27.aspx</link><description>Everything else.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>The Public Eye: Why Did Capitalism Fail?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/435646.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 05:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:435646</guid><dc:creator>DanielMuff</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/435646.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=435646</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	My reaction to &lt;a href="http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2011-08-24/article/38288?headline=The-Public-Eye-Why-Did-Capitalism-Fail-"&gt;The Public Eye: Why Did Capitalism Fail?&lt;span id="cke_bm_95S" style="display:none;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="display:none;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, by Bob Burnett&lt;span style="display:none;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span id="cke_bm_95E" style="display:none;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;US voters hate all politicians and there&amp;rsquo;s political unrest throughout the world.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This is already indicative of the over-generalization and collectivism we&amp;#39;ll read in the remainder of the article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="copy"&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Corporations seek to maximize return on capital by leveraging productivity and paying the least possible amount for taxes and labor.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		They also pay the least possible amount for raw materials and capital. Of course, if the author had mentioned that, then the reader my have began thinking about business-to-business transactions; if the capitalists are out to screw everyone else, then how is that they transact with each other since their interests conflict.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		&lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;Corporate executives pledge allegiance to their directors and shareholders.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Of course. They&amp;#39;re employees.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		&lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;The dominant corporate perspective is short term, the current financial quarter,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Proof?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;First, global corporations are too big. We&amp;rsquo;re living in the age of corporate dinosaurs. (The largest multinational is JP Morgan Chase with assets of $2 Trillion, 240,000 employees, and offices in 100 countries.) &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Misleading. Look at the liabilties too.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;The original dinosaurs perished because their huge bodies possessed tiny brains. Modern dinosaurs are failing because their massive bureaucracies possess miniscule hearts. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Of course, this will never happen to the anti-capitalistic government. *rolls eyes*&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;Since the Reagan era global corporations have followed the path of least resistance to profit; they&amp;rsquo;ve swallowed up their competitors and created monopolies,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		?????????????/ BUt but but btu Standard Oil did it the 19th century, so it would be more accurate to say &amp;quot;Since the era of Lincoln.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Okay. So the D-pad doesn&amp;#39;t work (don&amp;#39;t remember the last time it) in this RTE, which is making writing this post more frustrating than reading the article, so I&amp;#39;m giving up on this. I&amp;#39;ll let you guys take a stab at it.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;which have produced humongous bureaucracies. In the short-term, scale helps corporations grow profitable, but in the long-term it makes them inflexible and difficult to manage. Gigantism creates a culture where workers are encouraged to take enormous risks in order to create greater profits; it&amp;rsquo;s based upon the notion that the corporation is &amp;ldquo;too big to fail.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Second, global corporations disdain civil society. They&amp;rsquo;ve created a culture of organizational narcissism, where workers pledge allegiance to the enterprise. Corporate employees live in a bubble, where they log obscene hours and then vacation with their co-workers. Multinationals develop their own code of ethics and worldview separate from that of any national state. Corporate executives don&amp;rsquo;t care about the success or failure of any particular country, only the growth and profitability of their global corporation. (Many large corporations &lt;a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2011/03/ten_giant_us_companies_avoidin.html"&gt;pay no US income tax&lt;/a&gt;; in 2009 Exxon Mobil actually got a $156 M rebate.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Third, global corporations are modern outlaws, living outside the law. There is no &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_hand"&gt;invisible hand&lt;/a&gt; that regulates multinationals. In 1759 Philosopher Adam Smith argued that while wealthy individuals and corporations were motivated by self interest, an &amp;ldquo;invisible hand&amp;rdquo; was operating in the background ensuring that capitalist activities ultimately benefited society. In modern times this concept became the basis for the pronouncements of the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_school_of_economics"&gt; Chicago School of Economics&lt;/a&gt; that markets were inherently self regulating. However, the last five years have demonstrated that there is no &amp;ldquo;invisible hand&amp;rdquo; &amp;ndash; unregulated markets have spelled disaster for the average person. The &amp;ldquo;recovery&amp;rdquo; of 2009-10 ensured that &amp;ldquo;too big to fail&amp;rdquo; institutions would survive and the rich would continue to be rich. Meanwhile millions of good jobs were either eliminated or replaced by low-wage jobs with poor or no benefits.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Fourth, global corporations are ruining our &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_capital"&gt;natural capital&lt;/a&gt;. Four of the top 10 multinational corporations are energy companies, with Exxon Mobil leading the list. But there are &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil"&gt;many indications&lt;/a&gt; that our oil reserves are gone. Meanwhile, other forms of natural capital have been depleted &amp;ndash; arable land, water, minerals, forests, fish, and so forth. Multinational corporations have treated the environment as a free resource. When the timberlands of North America began to be depleted, lumber corporations moved to South America and then Asia. Now, the &amp;ldquo;easy pickings&amp;rdquo; are gone. Global corporations have ravished the world and citizens of every nation live with the consequences: dirty air, foul water, and pollution of every sort.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Fifth, global corporations have angered the world community. The world GDP is $63 Trillion but multinational corporations garner a disproportionate share &amp;ndash; with banks accounting for an estimated $4 trillion (bank assets are $100 trillion). Global black markets make $2 trillion &amp;ndash; illegal drugs account for at least $300 billion. In many parts of the world, a worker is not able to earn a living wage, have a bank account or drive a car, but can always obtain drugs, sex, and weapons. And while the world may not be one big village in terms of lifestyle, it shares an image of &amp;ldquo;the good life&amp;rdquo; that&amp;rsquo;s proffered in movies, TV, and the Internet. That&amp;rsquo;s what teenagers in Afghanistan have in common with teenagers in England; they&amp;rsquo;ve been fed the same image of success in the global community and they know it&amp;rsquo;s inaccessible. They are angry and, ultimately, their anger has the same target &amp;ndash; multinational corporations (and the governments that support them).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		We live in interesting times. The good news is we&amp;rsquo;re witnessing the failure of global corporate capitalism. The bad news is we don&amp;rsquo;t know what will replace it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>