General

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

Bert — Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:28 GMT

Not exactly made the whole thing up. There was talk all over NH that Dr. Paul was outperforming Romney in the polls. We were told Dr. Paul could get something like 31% and Romney 29%.

So, again, you based your whole thing about a "TON" of polls through a large game of telephone in the state of NH with most likely other FSP enthusiasts. This is on par with me going to a bar and doing a group speculation that so-and-so might win and calculate our own hyphothesis of percentages. That's not a poll.

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

John James — Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:23:52 GMT

"A TON of polls before the primary had Dr. Paul and Obamney tied at 1st. Some had Dr. Paul ahead by a few points."
- Freedom4Me73986

That's what you said. I asked you multiple times for just two of each of these polls, and this is what ensued (after multiple requests, mind you). And if you'll scroll down a bit from that post, after I listed all that nonsense, you tried one more link to an online poll (from DailyPaul, no less) where people could vote more than once.

And when I articulated this, your response was:

"Why are you so dead-set-against living independently?"

That's what you said. I could not make this up. It was in this very thread if anyone doesn't believe me. Scroll up. We're talking about simply providing a link to poll showing what Freedom4Me73986 said "A TON" [caps original] of polls showed. I simply asked for some of those links. And after a bunch of nonsense, the response is "Why are you so dead-set-against living independently?"

And all this after you promised to never post another NH or FSP-related topic on here again...which you have broken at least 4-6 times already.

1) Admit you made the whole thing up, had no proof and then strung the whole thing along pretending as if these polls you made up actually existed,

2) apologize for breaking your promise to not post virtually the only type of content you post, and,

3) actually honor your promise and never post NH or FSP-related content again.

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

Freedom4Me73986 — Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:01:04 GMT

Freedom4Me73986:

OK I'm sorry I haven't been able to give you the links you wanted. There was way too much hype around Dr. Paul in NH the weeks before the primary. People were saying he was going to beat Romney b/c of all the independent voters who are mostly young supporters of Dr. Paul.

Can we end this now?

So, basically you're saying you made the whole thing up?

Not exactly made the whole thing up. There was talk all over NH that Dr. Paul was outperforming Romney in the polls. We were told Dr. Paul could get something like 31% and Romney 29%.

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

John James — Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:56:24 GMT

I would think one should never make baseless assertions period. But I guess that's just me.

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

gotlucky — Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:41:47 GMT

Oh, you're relentless! I probably should never make baseless assertions in a discussion with you!

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

John James — Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:00:11 GMT

Freedom4Me73986:

OK I'm sorry I haven't been able to give you the links you wanted. There was way too much hype around Dr. Paul in NH the weeks before the primary. People were saying he was going to beat Romney b/c of all the independent voters who are mostly young supporters of Dr. Paul.

Can we end this now?

So, basically you're saying you made the whole thing up?

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

Bert — Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:49:32 GMT

People were saying he was going to beat Romney b/c of all the independent voters who are mostly young supporters of Dr. Paul.

So the tons of polls you claimed were actually "people" and you based it entirely off hearsay?

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

Freedom4Me73986 — Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:13:20 GMT

OK I'm sorry I haven't been able to give you the links you wanted. There was way too much hype around Dr. Paul in NH the weeks before the primary. People were saying he was going to beat Romney b/c of all the independent voters who are mostly young supporters of Dr. Paul.

Can we end this now?

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

John James — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:54:30 GMT

Freedom4Me73986:
Why are you so dead-set-against living independently?

What the f-ing hell does that have to do with you producing links to prove your claim about "A TON of polls before the primary had Dr. Paul and Obamney tied at 1st. Some had Dr. Paul ahead by a few points." ?

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

Chyd3nius — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:46:04 GMT

No. I was asking what's wrong with wanting to live primitively.

I don't care what you will do with your life. It's OK to me if you want to live in woods. But can you answer to my questions? Do you want that Free State Project succeeds and more libertarians will move to New Hampshire?

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

gotlucky — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:24:46 GMT

The proper response to HabbaBabba is touché.

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

Freedom4Me73986 — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:15:53 GMT

The women.

????????

So women is what's wrong with rewilding?

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

gotlucky — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:16:01 GMT

Well played.

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

HabbaBabba — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:54:18 GMT

The women.

Re: Freedom4me may have exposed himself

Freedom4Me73986 — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:27:57 GMT

No. I was asking what's wrong with wanting to live primitively.