<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/27.aspx</link><description>Everything else.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Ethics and Moral</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477257.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:03:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:477257</guid><dc:creator>vive la insurrection</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477257.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=477257</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	This is pretty hard to follow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	It may be best if you just typed your question out in your primary language and hope that someone can answer the question.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Anyway this is a decent enough superficial answer from wikipedia, that is taken from the Cambridge dictionary of philosophy:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-top:0.4em;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0.5em;margin-left:0px;line-height:1.5em;"&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-top:0.4em;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0.5em;margin-left:0px;line-height:1.5em;"&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ethics&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;(also known as&amp;nbsp;moral philosophy) is that branch of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy" style="text-decoration:none;background-image:none;background-attachment:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-color:initial;background-position:initial initial;background-repeat:initial initial;" title="Philosophy"&gt;philosophy&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;which addresses questions about morality. The word &amp;#39;ethics&amp;#39; is &amp;quot;commonly used interchangeably with &amp;#39;morality&amp;#39;&amp;nbsp;... and sometimes it is used more narrowly to mean the moral principles of a particular tradition, group, or individual.&amp;quot;&lt;sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-5" style="line-height:1em;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality#cite_note-5" style="text-decoration:none;background-image:none;background-attachment:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-color:initial;white-space:nowrap;background-position:initial initial;background-repeat:initial initial;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;[&lt;/span&gt;6&lt;span&gt;]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&amp;nbsp;Likewise, certain types of ethical theories, especially&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontological_ethics" style="text-decoration:none;background-image:none;background-attachment:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-color:initial;background-position:initial initial;background-repeat:initial initial;" title="Deontological ethics"&gt;deontological ethics&lt;/a&gt;, sometimes distinguish between &amp;#39;ethics&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;morals&amp;#39;: &amp;quot;Although the morality of people and their ethics amounts to the same thing, there is a usage that restricts morality to systems such as that of Kant, based on notions such as duty, obligation, and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_(personal_and_cultural)" style="text-decoration:none;background-image:none;background-attachment:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-color:initial;background-position:initial initial;background-repeat:initial initial;" title="Value (personal and cultural)"&gt;principles&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;of conduct, reserving ethics for the more&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotelianism" style="text-decoration:none;background-image:none;background-attachment:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-color:initial;background-position:initial initial;background-repeat:initial initial;" title="Aristotelianism"&gt;Aristotelian&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;approach to practical reasoning, based on the notion of a virtue, and generally avoiding the separation of &amp;#39;moral&amp;#39; considerations from other practical considerations.&amp;quot;&lt;sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-6" style="line-height:1em;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality#cite_note-6" style="text-decoration:none;background-image:none;background-attachment:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-color:initial;white-space:nowrap;background-position:initial initial;background-repeat:initial initial;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:none;background-image:none;background-attachment:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-color:initial;white-space:nowrap;"&gt;[&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font class="Apple-style-span" color="#0645ad"&gt;7&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-top:0.4em;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0.5em;margin-left:0px;line-height:1.5em;"&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-top:0.4em;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0.5em;margin-left:0px;line-height:1.5em;"&gt;
	That stated, and to throw in my 2 cents: etymologically speaking they are two different roots and outlooks. one is Greek, one Latin. &amp;nbsp;A more consistant etymological / cultural (or to help illustrate - customary / &lt;em&gt;ethos)&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;line would be to compare the Hellenistic concept of Arete to the Hellenistic concept of Ethos.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h3 style="color:black;background-image:none;background-attachment:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-color:initial;font-weight:bold;margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0.3em;margin-left:0px;overflow-x:hidden;overflow-y:hidden;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:0.17em;border-bottom-width:initial;border-bottom-style:none;border-bottom-color:initial;font-size:17px;background-position:initial initial;background-repeat:initial initial;"&gt;
	&lt;span class="editsection" style="-webkit-user-select:none;float:right;font-size:13px;font-weight:normal;margin-left:5px;"&gt;[&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morality&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=3" style="text-decoration:none;background-image:none;background-attachment:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-color:initial;background-position:initial initial;background-repeat:initial initial;" title="Edit section: Descriptive and normative"&gt;edit&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ethics and Moral</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477256.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:51:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:477256</guid><dc:creator>John C</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477256.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=477256</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	My question was not good elaborated. A libertarian told me that &amp;quot;before the moral, comes the ethics. What is unethical is immoral. After the ethics comes the moral. Ethical things can be considered immoral, like prostitution, promiscuity, etc&amp;quot;. I did not understand. Explain me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ethics and Moral</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477251.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 03:57:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:477251</guid><dc:creator>Clayton</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477251.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=477251</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	There are too many overlapping usages of these words to make a meaningful distinction between them. &amp;quot;Moral&amp;quot; tends to be used in a more religious or deontological sense and &amp;quot;ethical&amp;quot; tends to be used in a more academic or consequentialist sense but the usage is not consistent enough to actually draw a line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	We can absolutely distinguish between &amp;quot;right and wrong&amp;quot; as it pertains to individual welfare (pretty much synonymous with individualist consequentialism, that is, seeking one&amp;#39;s own highest good) and &amp;quot;right and wrong&amp;quot; as it pertains to social norms. The former vary from individual and the latter vary from place to place and time to time but do not vary from individual to individual at a given place and time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Confusion abounds on this subject because &lt;a href="http://www.shc.edu/theolibrary/graphics/vatican1.jpg"&gt;the powers that be&lt;/a&gt; benefit immensely from widespread confusion about morality (or ethics or whatever you want to call it).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Clayton -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Ethics and Moral</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477250.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 03:28:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:477250</guid><dc:creator>Aristophanes</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477250.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=477250</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I think I get what you are saying, but I I am not fluent in broken English.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Morals are for you as a person.&amp;nbsp; Ethics are for society.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	It is an ethical decision to ban prostitution, but a moral one to decide to be a John.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Murder isn&amp;#39;t moral, but a right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence is ethical.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m sure the cymini sectores on here will &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; me and provide more in depth definitions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ethics and Moral</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477246.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:50:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:477246</guid><dc:creator>John C</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/477246.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=477246</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	A libertarian told me that ethics comes early, after comes the morality. What is not ethic is immoral, but what is immoral can be ethic. For example: prostitution is immoral, but use the state to forbid this practice, is not ethic, therefore, forbid is not moral. Explain better...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>