General

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

John James — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:12:56 GMT

True, but Muff's point was not to show that I had gotten exposure on a very well-visited internet page, but that I had been shown love by someone way better than Raymond Sabath.

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

Marko — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:05:35 GMT

True but the reason to congratulate SD was not that he had been shown love by Raymond Sabath, but that his text had gotten exposure on a very well-visited internet page.

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

John James — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:54:37 GMT

Marko:
In truth SD wasn't just linked, he was cited and commented on.

...by the guy who is the focus of this thread.

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

Conza88 — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:52:20 GMT

Re: "The smoking gun however, is a lawsuit filed (SS) on January 14, 2008 where Ray was named as a defendant in a case filed in California: La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc vs Stomar Partners, Inc, Jim Miller, Raymond Nize and Does 1-10 (case no: 37-2007-000642640CU-BC-CTL)."

Looking at Stomar Partners; we find the following:

Stomar Partners LLC
9 North Wabash
Suite 602
Chicago, IL 60602
USA
Phone: 312 238-9172
Fax: 312 275-8749
Email: rw@stomarpartners.com
Company Contact: Raymond Walkosz [Add that to the Alias List]

RipOff Report: This is the plaintiff's outlining of his involvement with Jim Miller, and his partner Raymond Nize (Ray Nize) and adds a whole other layer of wth; but makes sense in the bigger picture. Some excerpts:

"...As far as my suit being "malicious",please review case number: LAM08M02083. You will see the judge dismissed it WITHOUT PREJUDICE because of the false document you sent to the court (meaning the Judge thought I served you in Chicago in error). Your document clearly LIES to the judge stating that you "do not have a place of business in California" and you stating RIGHT HERE ON RIP OFF REPORT THAT I WAS "BANNED FROM THE OFFICE" IN LOS ANGELES". Are you seriously forgetting your lies? You filed a "truthful" document with the Los Angeles court house on April 21st,2008 that you "don't have an office in Los Angeles" then on August 18th, 2008 you post on a public website (www.ripoffreport.com) that you DO have an office in Los Angeles that you "banned" me from. Do you not understand that you are creating a paper trail of lies? How you have not done prison time up until now is beyond me. [...]

Unbelievable Jim. How can you file a police report for something you THINK is missing from an office Ray and I paid the lease on? You are the detective Jim, maybe the problem isn't the "computer" that you are looking for but maybe - RAY NIZE? This was your business partner you entrusted your company to and this man has disappeared off the face of the earth with your company's information and you are worried about me? I am still here and the law enforcement authorities have my address since I carry a firearm. You make it seem like I am on the run. I just don't have time for your frivolous lawsuits you are now inventing to say I am harrassing you. It's not harrassment if you owe me money and are stealing from the shareholders.

And I say "stealing" because they are all wondering where you are with their money (go to www.investorshub.com and enter "IVAY" as the stock symbol to see my "back up".). I am reachable (feel free to send me a check any day you wish for my commissions owed), Ray is not. You boast an alliance with Homeland Security resources and you can't find your business partner? C'mon Jim, take some responsibility. Your business partner has disappeared. Your "computer" has disappeared and how many times have you called me complaining that you know he took your precious computer? You conveniently slant everything to appear the victim always. Maybe you should do a background check on people you appoint as business partners in the future. I mean what do I know? You are the one with the degree in background in "law enforcement" yet you cant find Ray Nize. Step it up Jim on the detective work ok. [...]

So please post the number to the "police report" that you filed. I would like to see it state "Uh, I am Jim Miller the president of I.S.A. and
my business partner Ray Nize just disappeared with thousands of shares of stock in my company and I cannot locate him anywhere on the planet earth and my company has been frozen from trading on the Pink Sheets and S.E.C. because of decisions Ray and I made but I would like to file a "missing computer" case at this time. Everything else can wait." Oh and I was "banned" from the office on May 7, 2008 but you called me asking me for investors and more money for I.S.A. You even state that Ray Nize robbed you on my voice mail and now you are posting that I robbed you on www.ripoffreport.com..."

Someone might want to ask Wenzel / Nize (?) about his visit to the Hollywood stars;

"...to confirm this was an event that Jim Miller took part in the year before Ray and I attended. In the meantime here are images of the investors of I.S.A.’s money hard at work. I didn’t know this until afterward that the money for this event and for our tickets was paid for by the stock holders. Yeah, that’s right $1000.00 per person to get in... "

Misc:

Nize Holdings - Suspended (Registered Agent: Raymond Nize)
Beacon Hill West, Inc. - Suspended (Registered Agent: Raymond Nize)

But when that's all said and done; even assuming it's all hearsay and Ray Nize (?) moved to berid of the situation (and everything he did was legit), and assuming this is actually Rob Wenzel... would it not behoove him to address it now that it's out? *shrugs*

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

Marko — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:29:34 GMT

In truth SD wasn't just linked, he was cited and commented on.

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

John James — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:17:07 GMT

DanielMuff:
EDIT: Btw, on FB, Kinsella linked to your post. Congrats! Wenzel links to Smiling Dave while Kinsella links to you lol

Don't know about you guys, but I think that means I win.

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

DanielMuff — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:57:44 GMT

Lol. I went down the rabbit hole before I saw WheyWhey's follow up post.

EDIT: Btw, on FB, Kinsella linked to your post. Congrats! Wenzel links to Smiling Dave while Kinsella links to you lol

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

John James — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:52:30 GMT

Was that supposed to be some kind of ironic IP/plagiarism joke?

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

DanielMuff — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:46:04 GMT

Oh snap! Wenzel admits to being Raymond Sabat: http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2008/07/government-isnt-god-fdic-sticks-banks.html

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

Marko — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:31:52 GMT

This is nice. Finally somebody joins me in critiquing his Soviet Union lecture. So he actually repeated whole sections of Wikipedia? Some scholar!

And he had posted he was going to produce an "expanded hard copy version", too funny! And what would that be, one of them Wikipedia books?

As I said when it came out, nothing about it struck me as establishing Wenzel as any kind of an expert on the topic (or even just well-read on it), but was in fact glaringly superficial, as well as inaccurate in places.

The name of the talk is 'An Examination of Key Factors in the Collapse the USSR' but what he actually gives is a gallop through the entire Soviet period. He explains this on the basis that the tale of the USSR is one of a 70-year long collapse. Since he devotes his hour to the entire Soviet history this means, he may not to go into depth on any aspect of it due to time constraints, but it may also mask the objective inability to speak on anything in depth due to a lack of knowledge as such.

Things must be pretty bad at MI if Bob Wenzel if their knowledge on the Soviet Union may be expanded by Bob Wenzel. The lecture is pretty wow. For the image MI is trying to project it's very naive and inaccurate. Nothing about it makes me think Wenzel's knowledge on the topic is anything other than superficial. Chunks of the talk are actually negative value.

Link.

Also just in the part of the speech the blog post John James linked highlights is, of course, an inaccuracy.

The kulaks were divided into three groups. . . [These were the groups]: those to be killed immediately, those to be sent to prison and those to be deported to Siberia or Russian Asia. The third category alone consisted of about 150,000 households, one million people. Stalin believed that such a brutal policy would persuade others in agricultural regions to accept the rule of Moscow and that resistance would end. Stalin wrote to [his aides] “We must break the back of the peasantry.”

Wenzel (repeating what he had learned on Wikipedia):
Category 1: to be executed
Category 2: to be incarcarated
Category 3: to be deported to Soviet hinterlands

Which is wrong. Actually:
Category 1: to be executed or incarcarated, quota set at 60,000 individuals
Category 2: to be deported to Soviet hinterlands, quota set at 150,000 households - in fact the plan was overfullfiled
Category 3: to be forcefully expropriated and resettled within their home district
Source: The Unknown Gulag by Lynne Viola.

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

Stephen Adkins — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:34:43 GMT

But seriously, this is incredible. I can't think of deserts more just than this, and so speedy! I guess I'm so used to statist courts that I forget how quickly and mercilessly the market can mete out justice.

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

John James — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:33:33 GMT

Ahh good ol' Reddit...

Gossip: 1. Wenzel is an idiot. 2. Wenzel is a plagiarist. 3. Wenzel is... not Wenzel? 8 former aliases revealed.

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

Stephen Adkins — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:31:43 GMT

Holy smokes. What at first seemed like a shameful waste of 2.5 hours has turned into the gift that keeps on giving. It's too bad no one in real life gives a flip about my libertarian drama, but the intrigue and mystery is almost too much to keep bottled up. I gotta tell someone about how Wenzel isn't who he claims to be!!

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

John James — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:28:54 GMT

Wenzel explains that this is because of his sensitive work commitments at the time.

Ah yes, of course.

Re: Robert Wenzel (if that is even his name), the pro-IP plagiarist liar

Wheylous — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:27:57 GMT

Original:

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2008/07/government-isnt-god-fdic-sticks-banks.html