<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Macroeconomy and Austrian views</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/108384.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:09:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:108384</guid><dc:creator>jimmy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/108384.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=108384</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Garrison&amp;#39;s work is excellent and, particularly for those who perhaps have a more traditional background in Economics (e.g. studied it at school or university) I think Garrison does and excellent job of communicating the differences between Austrian and Chicago School or Keynesian economics (which Garrison has clearly spent a great deal of time studying). Essentially this comes down the Austrian Capital Theory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m presuming you&amp;#39;re talking about Garrison&amp;#39;s Capitalism... if that&amp;#39;s the case then I haven&amp;#39;t read it but I&amp;#39;ve only heard good things about it. I&amp;#39;ve gone through his Time and Money lectures, listened to a number of MP3s of his classes and read a whole stack of his articles in the Mises Daily blogs and Garrison is awesome... You can&amp;#39;t go wrong with Capitalism.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, is this the first book you were thinking of reading on Austrian Economics? If so then I might recommend starting with something like Economics for Real People or Economics in One Lesson first (probably the earlier - the later is awesome but doesn&amp;#39;t necesarily give such a good overview of Austrian thought).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Macroeconomy and Austrian views</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/108277.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:09:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:108277</guid><dc:creator>Mibu Clan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/108277.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=108277</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;So I was reading the interview of Roger W. Garrison whom published his own thoughts, and a theory of Austrian Macroeconomics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the very few I have read, it seems clear that the Austrian thought is directed entirely into micro analysis, for whom better than the industries themselves to assess and conjure results... I believe this is quite valid (and makes sense)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I come to question your guys opinions on this guy&amp;#39;s book (if have ever read him or anything) and the development of a macro theory on Austrian thought, as a tool for understanding some dynamics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can say that &amp;nbsp;I am only a beginner, but I read and like the preference of a school devoted to essentially the underlying value as the principle of the entire theory, and that is individual freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyways, thanks for replies&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>