<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/114226.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:13:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:114226</guid><dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/114226.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=114226</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s an &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/pboettke/pubs/1990/Interpretive_reasoning.pdf"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; by Boettke.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I guess the best place to go would be &lt;i&gt;Economics and Hermeneutics&lt;/i&gt; by Lavoie.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/113689.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:00:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:113689</guid><dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/113689.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=113689</wfw:commentRss><description>I&amp;#39;m sure that convoluted, ivory-tower, post-modern pastimes such as hermeneutics contribute a lot to make libertarianism a more widely accepted philosophy...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/113536.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:43:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:113536</guid><dc:creator>hayekianxyz</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/113536.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=113536</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone know any good sources from Boettke and company? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/113098.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:39:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:113098</guid><dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/113098.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=113098</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Jon Irenicus:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Long is about as balanced as can be on the issue I think. He doesn&amp;#39;t come down in favour of the hermeneuticists, but he does a good job of showing in which respects they are right.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Roderick is really good at finding a middle ground between opposing positions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112963.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:39:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:112963</guid><dc:creator>Jon Irenicus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112963.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=112963</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Long is about as balanced as can be on the issue I think. He doesn&amp;#39;t come down in favour of the hermeneuticists, but he does a good job of showing in which respects they are right. But I think that Hoppe&amp;#39;s paper is still the most scathing critique of their position out there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112938.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:112938</guid><dc:creator>hayekianxyz</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112938.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=112938</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Murray Rothbard: &lt;a href="http://mises.org/story/2337"&gt;The Hermeneutical Invasion of Economics&lt;/a&gt;, David Gordon: &lt;a href="http://mises.org/etexts/hermeneutics.asp"&gt;Hermeneutics vs. Austrian Economics.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gordon isn&amp;#39;t a huge fan as far as I&amp;#39;m aware, he trashes Boettke and company in some of his book reviews.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112934.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:37:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:112934</guid><dc:creator>fakename</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112934.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=112934</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;hey, thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112819.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:24:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:112819</guid><dc:creator>wombatron</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112819.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=112819</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe Long also discusses hermeneutics in a favorable light in &lt;i&gt;Wittgenstein, Austrian Economics, and the Logic of Action&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112812.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:46:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:112812</guid><dc:creator>Jon Irenicus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112812.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=112812</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Their view is balanced. Either way, look up Hoppe&amp;#39;s&lt;i&gt; In Defense of Extreme Rationalism&lt;/i&gt; and Selgin&amp;#39;s &lt;i&gt;Praxeology and Understanding.&lt;/i&gt; They mention economists in favour of a hermeneutic approach.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>methodology of economics</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112762.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:57:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:112762</guid><dc:creator>fakename</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/112762.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=112762</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know what happened with the hermenetical invasion of economics?&amp;nbsp; I keep hearing references to it by David Gordon and Murray Rothbard but they are obvious opponents so I was looking for a balanced view of this event.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>