<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Would it have made a large difference had we gone Jeffersonian than Washingtonian?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/137491.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:10:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:137491</guid><dc:creator>Andy Wessel</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/137491.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=137491</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think, in my ignorance, that a strong central authority was our fate in order to be in a position to counter the dictatorships of the 20th century.&amp;nbsp; After a proper education I have been able to reembrace my Jeffersonian roots.&amp;nbsp; I agree that AoC would have set a better example for the world.&amp;nbsp; Additionally, if we had not had our own Central Bank (The Fed) much of the financing of the World Wars would have been impossible.&amp;nbsp; Thereby reducing them to minor border skirmishes, easily concluded through diplomacy if they even occurred at all.&amp;nbsp; Many of the 20th century&amp;#39;s most repressive regimes were in fact supported by us.&amp;nbsp; Such waste....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Would it have made a large difference had we gone Jeffersonian than Washingtonian?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/137443.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:21:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:137443</guid><dc:creator>No2statism</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/137443.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=137443</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;If we had the 3 Anti-Federalist proposals (France alliance, no national bank, and agrarian economy)&amp;nbsp;as Articles in the Constitution, would we be a lot better off today?&amp;nbsp; I think so; of course, it didn&amp;#39;t happen because Washington was a&amp;nbsp;federalist.&amp;nbsp; The problems remaining still may have brought a problem (Congress may pass taxes, 2nd Amendment implies a state right, emininent domain, and right to an attorney at private expense.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did the Federalists accept not having&amp;nbsp;a Constitutional&amp;nbsp;alliance with Britain and&amp;nbsp;no explicit guarantee&amp;nbsp;of a&amp;nbsp;national bank b/c they knew it would turn out the way it has today?&amp;nbsp; Or was it truly so neither side would dominate the other?&amp;nbsp; I know Washington warned against Alliances and Factions, but he created the first one--the Federalists were the first faction.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They should&amp;#39;ve just left the AoC as the Supreme Law.&amp;nbsp; I honestly think the rest of the world would be a lot better off too, because the AoC would&amp;#39;ve set a much better example.&amp;nbsp; I think the state constitutions would&amp;#39;ve eventually matched each other for more individual liberty, and I think slavery would&amp;#39;ve ended earlier.&amp;nbsp; Revolutions would&amp;#39;ve been much easier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>