<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: What branch of economics is this?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/156216.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:22:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:156216</guid><dc:creator>Jon Irenicus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/156216.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=156216</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;d fit into what is commonly referred to as welfare economics. Even Rothbard terms his own treatment of these kind of questions that. As for price theory, it&amp;#39;s a rather common term, so I&amp;#39;m not sure why you can&amp;#39;t find an entry on it. But it&amp;#39;s rooted in microeconomics, and modern economics is more focussed on macro.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What branch of economics is this?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/156006.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:50:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:156006</guid><dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/156006.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=156006</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, you&amp;#39;re right that you cannot divide economics into hermetically sealed compartments. As Mises puts it: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&amp;quot;There is no specialization, as all problems are linked with one
another. In dealing with any part of the body of knowledge one deals
actually with the whole.&amp;nbsp; . . . The economist must never be a specialist. In
dealing with any problem he must always fix his gaze upon the whole
system. . . . Economics does not allow of any breaking up into special
branches. It invariably deals with the interconnectedness of all the
phenomena of action.&amp;quot; (quoted &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://mises.org/article.aspx?Id=1676"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But on the other hand, Mises didn&amp;#39;t write HA in one chapter. He split the topics into different sections, while showing how they are interconnected and unified.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I think we can find an answer to my question.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wikipedia defines &amp;quot;welfare economics&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;a branch of economics that uses microeconomic techniques to simultaneously determine allocative efficiency within an economy and the income distribution associated with it.&amp;quot; So it would seem that the problem of social coordination is part of welfare economics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in this chapter Osterfeld is drawing from Kirzner&amp;#39;s &lt;i&gt;Market Theory and the Price System&lt;/i&gt;, which is a book on price theory. A weird thing: there&amp;#39;s no wikipedia page for &amp;quot;price theory.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What branch of economics is this?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/155981.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:06:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:155981</guid><dc:creator>hayekianxyz</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/155981.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=155981</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s a difficult question, and to me it just seems to show how true Mises&amp;#39; insight is. Namely, you can&amp;#39;t divide economics up neatly into seperate compartments, there is one unified body of economic science (for the praxeologist that would be the study of human action). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>What branch of economics is this?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/155977.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:01:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:155977</guid><dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/155977.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=155977</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;In Chapter 7 of &lt;i&gt;Freedom, Society, and State&lt;/i&gt;, David Osterfeld talks about the problem of social coordination. Specifically, there are three problems of coordination that must be solved in any socio-economic system:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Priorities: what goods should be produced.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Efficiency: what form of production will allocate resources to their most highly valued ends.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Distribution: how to compensate each participant in the productive process.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, the market economy is the optimal solution to these problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is: what branch/field/subject of economics does this fall under? Welfare economics? Price theory?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>