<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288735.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:14:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288735</guid><dc:creator>Bogdan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288735.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288735</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I think, they would be. But there will be impossible 20-percent profitability of that bonds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288716.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:23:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288716</guid><dc:creator>sthomper</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288716.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288716</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;if gold and silver were the actual currency...would there still be treasury bonds?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288676.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:26:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288676</guid><dc:creator>Bogdan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288676.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288676</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that in short or middle term treasury bonds are more likely. But in long term gold have to rise more. Treasury bonds are fiat money so if government don&amp;#39;t issue them in deflationary way (issue less new bonds). If that bonds still will rise in a price there will be speculative market bubble.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;!!! I just realised that ABCT explains that. In short (or even middle) term bonds can rise in price (because of speculative motives). It is a boom. But every boom will end by a bust: and gold will rise in a price. So in a long term (which is measured in one or more BC) gold price will allways rise. The period between 1980 and 2000 was the period without boosts (and at the beginning - in 80s - there was also quite conservative policy of FRS).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288605.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:46:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288605</guid><dc:creator>z1235</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288605.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288605</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Bodia:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t understand how treasury bonds can compete with gold in a long term. Treasury bonds are also some kind of fiat money so they have to be inflationary, don&amp;#39;t they?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Assume you have a nest-egg today which you&amp;#39;re contemplating to allocate between two choices: gold or bonds. Case 1: Bonds yield (annual return is) 20%. Case 2: Bonds yield 2%. I propose that your gold allocation would be much smaller under Case1 than under Case2. Things are actually tons more interesting once you get into more detail but this is neither the time nor the place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Z.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288595.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:35:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288595</guid><dc:creator>BlackNumero</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288595.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288595</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the main reasons was the good performance of the U.S economy. Foreigners as well as Americans started to have greater confidence in the U.S economy after stagflation and especially when the U.S was at its zenith (inflation tamed in the 80s, fall of Soviet revolution, booming 90s economy, supposed Clinton budget surplus, etc etc).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288558.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:48:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288558</guid><dc:creator>Bogdan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288558.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288558</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t understand how treasury bonds can compete with gold in a long term. Treasury bonds are also some kind of fiat money so they have to be inflationary, don&amp;#39;t they?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288555.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:24:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288555</guid><dc:creator>z1235</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288555.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288555</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Treasury bond yields were 15%+ then -- competing with gold as a risk-free inflation hedge -- and have been going down (bond prices going up) ever since. Yields are at 2% now, and not so risk-free any more, hence gold is left as the only safe inflation hedge. This explains the difference in gold&amp;#39;s price behavior then and now. The current long-term rally in gold is safe until Treasury yields explode to 20%+ levels (bond prices collapse).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Z.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288549.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:22:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288549</guid><dc:creator>Bogdan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288549.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288549</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kitco.com/LFgif/au75-pres.gif" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.kitco.com/scripts/hist_charts/yearly_graphs.plx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From 1979 to 2004 the price of gold was in one corridor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288545.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288545</guid><dc:creator>bbnet</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288545.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288545</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Gold did rise in price to US Dollar for the most part from misd 70s through the 90s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;year - monthly mean $/oz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1970 - $36/oz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1975 - $160/oz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1980 - $614/oz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1985 - $317/oz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1990 - $383/oz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1995 - $384/oz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2000 - $279/oz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2005 - $444/oz&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why gold did not rise in a price during 80-90s?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288542.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:43:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:288542</guid><dc:creator>Bogdan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/288542.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=288542</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I see gold as the best way of financial investments. Its supply is limited and in the conditions of growth of the population and labour productivity it should constantly rise in price in middle - and long term perspectives, especially in measurements of inflating currencies.&lt;br /&gt;We observe it last years. Emitters emit currency and therefore gold promptly rises in price.&lt;br /&gt;But why gold did not rise in price from the middle of 70-s&amp;#39; till last years 90-s&amp;#39;?&amp;nbsp; Was the currency policy during that time&amp;nbsp; so conservative (even deflationary?)? I can&amp;#39;t believe that.&lt;br /&gt;Whether we can expect the similar phenomenon in the future (not the nearest, certainly. Here all is clear)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>