<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Higher Order Goods, What Determines What They Are Worth?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/305011.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:21:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:305011</guid><dc:creator>Don Lloyd</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/305011.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=305011</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;No, it&amp;#39;s not the cost of the complementary factor, the plain-hotdog in this case, but its subjective value, which in this case&amp;nbsp;happens to be that of &amp;nbsp;a first order good in its own right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards, Don&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Higher Order Goods, What Determines What They Are Worth?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/304985.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:51:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:304985</guid><dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/304985.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=304985</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;So it depends on the value spread of the first order good and the cost of complementary factors. So what?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Higher Order Goods, What Determines What They Are Worth?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/304899.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:03:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:304899</guid><dc:creator>Don Lloyd</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/304899.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=304899</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;See my blog entry below for a brief&amp;nbsp;argument that neither the value nor the price of higher order goods can, in general, be imputed from the value of an associated first order good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/donlloyd/archive/2010/02/06/the-subjective-value-of-mustard-and-its-implications.aspx"&gt;http://mises.org/Community/blogs/donlloyd/archive/2010/02/06/the-subjective-value-of-mustard-and-its-implications.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards, Don&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>