<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: History of Thought Topic</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317456.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:46:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317456</guid><dc:creator>Daniel James Sanchez</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317456.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317456</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes Mises&amp;#39; Socialism, using Hulsmann&amp;#39;s bio (Last Knight of Liberalism) as a crucial reference. &amp;nbsp;See especially the chapter &amp;quot;A Copernican Shift&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Socialism and Econ. Calc. in the Soc. Commonwealth weren&amp;#39;t just significant for demolishing socialism with economic calculation; they were significant for advancing economic calculation theory as such.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you cover Say, you could use Rothbard&amp;#39;s Classical Economics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: History of Thought Topic</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317427.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:39:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317427</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Cain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317427.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317427</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Mises would be good too.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: History of Thought Topic</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317384.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:10:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317384</guid><dc:creator>von Vodka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317384.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317384</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I would take the mainstream intelligencia of the early 20th century who thought socialism would be such a noble experiment and compare it with Mises&amp;#39; voice of reason. Talk about Mises&amp;#39; analysis of the price system and economic calculation. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>History of Thought Topic</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317379.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:49:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317379</guid><dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317379.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317379</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to write a paper for an History of Economic Thought class, and I am torn between writing about Say, and perhaps Mises&amp;#39; Socialism.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>