<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Rationing No! but Yes to "comparative effectiveness" in government Healthcare</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317424.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:34:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317424</guid><dc:creator>fakename</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317424.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317424</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Rationing under a (relatively) free market is a lot different than one with more state intervention. In the former, there are actually incentives to improve quality and quantity in the other the incentives lead to an opposing outcome.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In any case, what&amp;#39;s in a name? If rationing is just comparative effectiveness then I guess comparative effectiveness is rationing -I&amp;#39;m sure leibniz had something to say about this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the last analysis too, I noticed things without scientific proof won&amp;#39;t be funded anymore. Scientific proof itself wasn&amp;#39;t always considered scientific and was outlawed for a long time and now we humans are going to just say &amp;quot;after 10,000 years of mistakes we&amp;#39;re finally confident enough to say &amp;#39;we have objective truth&amp;#39; and that anything which is not consonant with this will be outlawed&amp;quot;?&amp;nbsp; This constitutes a rebellion against human reason, and nature!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rationing No! but Yes to "comparative effectiveness" in government Healthcare</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317398.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:07:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317398</guid><dc:creator>DD5</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317398.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317398</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#39;t you love it how Statists all of a sudden acknowledge scarcity only after they take over.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From CNN:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/24/health.care.viewer.faqs/index.html?hpt=C1"&gt;Answers To Your Questions on Healthcare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;Question:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;nbsp;Is there anything in the bill about rationing health care?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;Answer:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;nbsp;No one is using the term &amp;quot;rationing&amp;quot; as part of the bill. But there is a term called comparative effectiveness. And that&amp;#39;s this idea that we figure out what works in medicine and make sure to pay for those things. This also means that there are a lot of things being done right now where there&amp;#39;s not scientific proof that it works and maybe those things won&amp;#39;t get paid any more. Some people call that rationing. Other people say, look, rationing exists under the current system. It&amp;#39;s just that the insurance companies are essentially rationing by denying payment or dropping people off their coverage.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If anybody wants to take a crack at debunking this &amp;quot;answer&amp;quot;, go right ahead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>