<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Supply and Demand. The two Variables?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317935.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:35:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317935</guid><dc:creator>Samuel Clemens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317935.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317935</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
There is an inverse
relationship between price and quantity demanded. If the price goes up,
the &lt;i&gt;quantity&lt;/i&gt; demanded
goes down (but demand itself &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;stays the same&lt;/span&gt;). If the price
decreases, the
&lt;i&gt;quantity&lt;/i&gt; demanded increases (but again demand &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;stays the same&lt;/span&gt;).
On a graph,
an inverse relationship is represented by a downward sloping line
from left to right.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Supply and Demand. The two Variables?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317780.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:49:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317780</guid><dc:creator>strat2131</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317780.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317780</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Its impossible, to supply infinite combinations of a good at any point in time. the supply graph is thus an Estimation of the future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;demand = Ex post&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Supply = Ex ante&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Supply and Demand. The two Variables?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317756.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:50:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317756</guid><dc:creator>Samuel Clemens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317756.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317756</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Since you define  the &amp;quot;demand for&amp;quot; quantity is given as &amp;quot;the quantity demanded at this 
exact particular point in time.&amp;quot;, you should define the &amp;quot;supply of&amp;quot; quantity as &amp;quot;the quantity supplied at this 
exact particular point in time.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; In this case, both are unknown, but can be approximated by a number of methods.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Supply and Demand. The two Variables?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317586.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317586</guid><dc:creator>strat2131</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317586.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317586</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Basically, On my University forums, we&amp;#39;ve had a debate, about the fundamentals of supply (First semester, at Sydney Uni.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In order to create a sloped non-linear (both not straight and not with a constant velocity or acceleration) graph &amp;quot;/&amp;quot; you must use two variables. One being the X and one being the Y.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Y is price, and the X is quantity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However while the demand for quantity is given as &amp;quot;the quantity demanded at this exact particular point in time.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The nature of supply is abit different, because it involves business estimating the supply at each given price level. This is because they cannot know for sure, how much they can supply at each given price point (unknown costs in expanding production etc etc.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is basically the nature of my argument. In that if you hold &amp;quot;business expectations&amp;quot; constant, you will end up with a vertical supply line. And that by factoring in &amp;quot;business expectations&amp;quot; as a &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;Variable&lt;/span&gt; you will gain the traditional Marshallian sloped supply line. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I used alot of austrian sources in the argument, namely Klein, and Salerno. Just want to make sure my approach is actually consistent with the Austrian method.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So incase you find my writing abit difficult to understand. The question is, is it possible to hold &amp;quot;business expectations constant&amp;quot; while constructing a (non-vertical) supply graph?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>