<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: What role does the government and the AMA play in the American healthcare system?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317842.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317842</guid><dc:creator>Scrooge McDuck</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317842.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317842</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Which level of government created the licensing board? Who decides who is on the board?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What role does the government and the AMA play in the American healthcare system?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317821.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:07:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317821</guid><dc:creator>krazy kaju</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317821.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317821</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;AMA licensure has limited the number of medical schools: &lt;a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/archives/fm/08-90.html"&gt;http://www.lewrockwell.com/archives/fm/08-90.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Georgia,Times New Roman,Times,serif;font-size:small;"&gt;The 
              Flexner Report of 1910, which Murray N. Rothbard discusses
 elsewhere 
              in this issue, further restricted entry into the 
profession, as 
              legislatures closed non-AMA-approved medical schools. In 
1906, there 
              were 163 medical schools; in 1920, 85; in 1930, 76; and in
 1944, 
              69. The relative number of physicians dropped 25%, but AMA
 membership 
              zoomed almost 900%.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Georgia,Times New Roman,Times,serif;font-size:small;"&gt;During 
              the great depression, as Milton Friedman notes, the AMA 
ordered 
              the remaining medical schools to admit fewer students, and
 every 
              school followed instructions. If they didn&amp;#39;t, they risked 
losing 
              their AMA accreditation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Georgia,Times New Roman,Times,serif;font-size:small;"&gt;Today, 
              with increasing government intervention in medicine &amp;ndash; 
often at 
              the AMA&amp;#39;s behest &amp;ndash; the organization exercises somewhat 
less direct 
              policy control. But it still has tremendous influence on 
hospitals, 
              medical schools, and licensing boards.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Georgia,Times New Roman,Times,serif;font-size:small;"&gt;It 
              limits the number of medical schools, and admission to 
them, and 
              makes sure the right to practice is legally restricted. 
The two 
              are linked: to get a license, one must graduate from an 
AMA-approved 
              program. And there is a related AMA effort to stop the 
immigration 
              of foreign physicians. The AMA also limits the number of 
hospitals 
              certified for internships And licensure boards will accept
 only 
              AMA-approved internships.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;" align="left"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Georgia,Times New Roman,Times,serif;font-size:small;"&gt;The 
              licensure boards &amp;ndash; who invariably represent medical 
societies &amp;ndash; can revoke licenses for a variety of reasons, including 
&amp;quot;unprofessional 
              conduct,&amp;quot; a term undefined in law. In the past, it has 
included 
              such practices as price advertising.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: What role does the government and the AMA play in the American healthcare system?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317817.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:58:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317817</guid><dc:creator>Jon Irenicus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317817.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317817</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not familiar with the US system, but I imagine that it is the AMA that sets who can become a doctor (i.e. MDs) and who cannot and also which regulates the length and content of the curriculum? If so one need not be a member to be affected by it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>What role does the government and the AMA play in the American healthcare system?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317777.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:47:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:317777</guid><dc:creator>Scrooge McDuck</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/317777.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=317777</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I have heard people argue that the reason that America&amp;#39;s healthcare costs are so high have to do with the AMA and the restriction of the supply of doctors. This makes sense, but how does the AMA restrict the supply of doctors? I understand that the AMA is essentially a guild and can therefore limit who can and cannot become a member. However, only 22% of physicians and medical students are members of the AMA. What about the other non-AMA physicians?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To my second question, does the government issue licenses proclaiming that an individual is a doctor and can legally practice medicine? How does the government do this? Does the government do it by regulating the requirements for medical schools? I understand that you can&amp;#39;t just claim to be a doctor and open up a practice with no training, I&amp;#39;m just wondering what training is required and who decides that and how.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry if some of these are stupid questions, I am just trying to clarify my understanding of the U.S. medical system. Even from pro-liberty individuals, I hear some about the AMA and that they restrict the supply of doctors, but the mechanism through which that is done isn&amp;#39;t explained. You can become a legitimate physician without dealing with the AMA, right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>