Economics Questions

Re: Harvard Economist Jeffrey Miron on Financial Regulation

czelaya — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:44:20 GMT

He's a fellow at the CATO Institute. I've seen him many times in debates on FOX and CNN. He's a pretty good debator but you can tell he doesn't have a lot of patience with stupidity. I always look forward to see him. He's also done several educational and libertarian speakings at CATO.

Re: Harvard Economist Jeffrey Miron on Financial Regulation

Chris — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:07:18 GMT

I have a book by Miron called Drug War Crimes that I used in a paper arguing against the war on flowers, I mean, drugs.

Re: Harvard Economist Jeffrey Miron on Financial Regulation

krazy kaju — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:39:26 GMT

I'm pretty sure Miron is one of the last (if not the last) academic economists to actually believe the "seasonal cycles" version of the business cycle. Though he isn't an Austrian, he is staunchly in favor of free markets.

Re: Harvard Economist Jeffrey Miron on Financial Regulation

Esuric — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:59:55 GMT

From Harvard? Wow.

Re: Harvard Economist Jeffrey Miron on Financial Regulation

nirgrahamUK — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:45:10 GMT

nice find

Harvard Economist Jeffrey Miron on Financial Regulation

krazy kaju — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:50:54 GMT

Link

URL: http://jeffreymiron.com/2010/04/a-policy-trilema-maybe-not/

Quote:

Absent the moral hazards created by policy, private actors will be more cautious about risk. Absent the false assurances of regulation, financial market participants will exercise due diligience and diversification. The economy will experience ups and downs but not depressions, and financial crises will occur but not seriously damage the rest of the economy.

This view is fantasy, you say? No, it’s a description of the U.S. economy – roughly – from its inception to the founding of the Fed in 1914. The policies that generate moral hazard were all but absent, and U.S. economic performance was impressive. Recessions and financial panics occurred, but none on the scale of the Great Depression or the Great Recession.

Just a coincidence? I think not.

Hope someone finds this useful in a debate. (: