<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Economic Terminology</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/354027.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 05:25:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:354027</guid><dc:creator>Coase</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/354027.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=354027</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Explaining economics to beginners is always better with less terminology. Once the terminology is understood, however, it&amp;#39;s usually better. &amp;quot;New money used to buy government bonds&amp;quot; is awkward, clunky, and restrictive, not to mention a pain. Debt monetization is elegant. If you want to learn monetary economics, mastering the terminology will ultimately make it easier, not harder.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Sometimes economic terminology can be misleading. &lt;a href="http://www.chron.com/commons/persona.html?newspaperUserId=the_teenage_economist&amp;amp;plckPersonaPage=BlogViewPost&amp;amp;plckUserId=the_teenage_economist&amp;amp;plckPostId=Blog%3athe_teenage_economistPost%3a48384ba6-250a-4cb3-88a6-b89b3756e0c0&amp;amp;plckController=PersonaBlog&amp;amp;plckScript=personaScript&amp;amp;plckElementId=personaDest"&gt;I argue here that &amp;quot;market failure&amp;quot; is an example of just that.&lt;/a&gt; &amp;quot;Public good&amp;quot; can also be misleading to noneconomists, and &amp;quot;methodological individualism&amp;quot; can generate a lot of pushback before people understand what it means. Trade deficits sound scary before they&amp;#39;re understood. I&amp;#39;m sure many more examples of terms that sound misleading could easily be thought of. Ultimately, however, anyone who refuses to learn economics or better understand the ideas because of a few confusing terms probably wasn&amp;#39;t going to be persuaded to minarchism or anarcho-capitalism anyway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Economic Terminology</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/354024.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 05:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:354024</guid><dc:creator>Smiling Dave</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/354024.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=354024</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Hear hear and clap clap!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I couldn&amp;#39;t agree more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I think there are a few reasons for the obscurities:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	1. Phrases originating with the govt. An example is &amp;quot;quantitative easing&amp;quot;, which just means &amp;quot;printing money&amp;quot;. The govt WANTS what they do to be obscure. Nobody will be outraged by their audacity and theft if they don&amp;#39;t even understand what they are doing. And of course, since the govt plays such a huge role in our economy, their vocabulary will tend to be picked up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	2. Phrases originating from Mises&amp;#39; poor command of English. For example, in Human Action, he calls a right triangle [one that has an angle of 90 degrees] a &amp;quot;rectangular triangle.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Apodicitic&amp;quot; is a prime suspect here. He could have found a better word.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	3. Economists wanting to impress the world with big words. There are many people who have walked the Earth thinking &amp;quot;The bigger and/or more uncommon the word I use, the more people will think I&amp;#39;m hot stuff.&amp;quot; You will notice that the more obnoxious the character, the more awful will be his choice of words. Not going to mention names. You know who you are.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	4. Poorly chosen words to describe concepts never considered before. I mean, of course, &amp;quot;praxeology&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;catalectics&amp;quot;. Finding the perfect new word is an art in itself. For example, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_H._Cooper" title="Kenneth
 H. Cooper"&gt;Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&lt;/a&gt; was truly inspired when he invented the word &amp;quot;aerobics&amp;quot;. But not everyone can do that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Economic Terminology</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/353956.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:29:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:353956</guid><dc:creator>Gero</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/353956.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=353956</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Do you believe any aspects of economics can be better explained with less economic terminology? For example, instead of using the phrase &amp;lsquo;debt monetization&amp;rsquo;, one says &amp;lsquo;new money used to buy government bonds&amp;rsquo;. One could argue the latter definition uses economic terms, but it seems more easily understood than the former.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I wonder how many other forum readers do not fully understand the economic terminology used here. One can use an online search engine to find a definition, but using simpler language to express an idea would seem better at persuading people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>