<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Capital</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/357428.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:45:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:357428</guid><dc:creator>MarLen</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/357428.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=357428</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	According to &lt;strong&gt;B&amp;ouml;hm-Bawerk&lt;/strong&gt;, in their book,&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt; The Positive Theory of Capital&lt;/em&gt;, capital is &lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;group of Products which serve as means to the Acquisition of Goods&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;. Accoding to this idea,&lt;span class="short_text" id="result_box"&gt;&lt;span title=""&gt; we conclude that money is capital, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="short_text" id="result_box"&gt;&lt;span title=""&gt;because money is used as a mean to the acquisition of goods. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="short_text" id="result_box"&gt;&lt;span title=""&gt;After he said that &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;bow and arrows, and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;orphans:2;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;widows:2;word-spacing:0px;font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,clean,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:15px;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-converted-space"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;boat and net&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="short_text" id="result_box"&gt;&lt;span title=""&gt; is capital. user the idea of John Clark, that said that &lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;primitive man &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;orphans:2;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;widows:2;word-spacing:0px;font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:collapse;font-family:arial,helvetica,clean,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:15px;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-converted-space"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;to become &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;orphans:2;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;widows:2;word-spacing:0px;font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:collapse;font-family:arial,helvetica,clean,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:15px;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;a capitalist&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Neanderthal Man was an capitalist?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	But in same book B&amp;ouml;hm-Bawerk said that &lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;in political economy and in practical life, generally we have long been accustomed to treat of certain great social problems as problems of capital, and in doing so we have had in our minds, not a conception which embraced labour, but a conception that opposed capital to labour. Capital and Labour, Capitalism and Socialism, Interest on capital and Wages of labour, are certainly not harmless synonyms; they express the strongest conceivable social and economical contrasts.&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt; In this assertion, woul B&amp;ouml;hm-Bawerk&lt;span class="short_text" id="result_box"&gt;&lt;span title=""&gt; agreeing with marxist &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;conception of capital has &amp;quot;social relation&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>