<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Steep Yield Curve: Inflation or Growth?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398583.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:00:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:398583</guid><dc:creator>Bogart</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398583.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=398583</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	The answer is that it has been historically an indicator of growth and there is an argument based upon logic to say so.&amp;nbsp; The real issue is what is the growth.&amp;nbsp; Inflation, and stagflation, are showing their ugly heads.&amp;nbsp; So this indicator could be (I believe that it is) an indicator of increased GDP based purely upon increases in prices.&amp;nbsp; Which means that it is an indicator of misery and the loss of realy productive capacity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Steep Yield Curve: Inflation or Growth?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398554.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:09:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:398554</guid><dc:creator>krazy kaju</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398554.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=398554</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	It could be both. A lot of investors are expecting higher price inflation, but at the same time, we could witness a last-ditch boom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Steep Yield Curve: Inflation or Growth?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398492.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:31:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:398492</guid><dc:creator>Harry Jarin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398492.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=398492</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Came across this article at ZeroHedge:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/why-contrary-chairmans-lies-record-steep-yield-curve-may-be-most-bearish-indicator-available"&gt;http://www.zerohedge.com/article/why-contrary-chairmans-lies-record-steep-yield-curve-may-be-most-bearish-indicator-available&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Naturally, having an Austrian economics background and having read Bob Murphy&amp;#39;s latest article, I&amp;#39;m of course going to argue that across-the-board inflation is on the horizon (or closer than the horizon) and that the steepness of the yield curve is foreshadowing rising inlation. But I was a little underwhelmed with the arguments of that article, which I felt didn&amp;#39;t adequately explain why exactly &amp;quot;this time is different&amp;quot; and why the steep yield curve is not a harbinger of economic growth (as the historical record would indicate). Would anyone like to help fill in the gaps?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>