<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Fisherian Theory of Interest</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398721.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:21:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:398721</guid><dc:creator>Caley McKibbin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398721.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=398721</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Probably related somehow to GDP as a &lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/22644.aspx"&gt;measure of economic growth&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;ve been wondering that for 7 years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Fisherian Theory of Interest</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398719.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:16:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:398719</guid><dc:creator>Michelangelo</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398719.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=398719</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Why is it then that the mainstream is so scared of deflation if the real interest rate is independent of monetary variables?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Fisherian Theory of Interest</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398716.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 01:49:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:398716</guid><dc:creator>Caley McKibbin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398716.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=398716</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I don&amp;#39;t know anything about Fisher.&amp;nbsp; But, that is obviously true about interest rates adjusting downward for deflation.&amp;nbsp; In the hearing with Ron Paul one of the boneheads was ranting and raving about how deflation would destroy people already in debt with adjustable rate mortgages.&amp;nbsp; Either DiLorenzo or Vedder said something against that, probably this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Fisherian Theory of Interest</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398715.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 01:46:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:398715</guid><dc:creator>Esuric</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398715.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=398715</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt; If this is true then the fear that many mainstream economist have of deflation harming debtors should be null as people got lower than otherwise rates because of the expected deflation. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Indeed, and this is how it&amp;#39;s taught in any undergraduate course in monetary theory. The Fisher effect (r&lt;sub&gt;r&lt;/sub&gt;=r&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;-pie&lt;sup&gt;e&lt;/sup&gt;) says that the real rate of interest is entirely independent of monetary variables (not affected by either inflation or deflation).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fisherian Theory of Interest</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398714.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 01:39:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:398714</guid><dc:creator>Michelangelo</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/398714.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=398714</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I&amp;#39;ve always had a problem with the Fisherian Theory of Interest, even before I really cared for Austrian economics. It emphasized the issue of inflation far too much and ignored what &amp;#39;real interest&amp;#39; was. Recently though I&amp;#39;ve been rethinking my objections. Might I get everyone else&amp;#39;s thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	With the Fisher theory we can say that interest rates take into account of expected inflation and so add on a premium on what the interest rate would be otherwise. Can not the opposite be said as well though? That in a situation where &lt;em&gt;deflation&lt;/em&gt; is expected the &amp;#39;real interest&amp;#39; would receive a discount.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	If this is true then the fear that many mainstream economist have of deflation harming debtors should be null as people got lower than otherwise rates because of the expected deflation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>