<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Business Cycle Theories</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/525.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:50:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:525</guid><dc:creator>Niccolò</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/525.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=525</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Most modern business cycle theories aren&amp;#39;t so much theories about the business cycle as they are theories about what causes the market to go into recession (like political business cycle, cycles caused by a drop in demand, cycles caused by etc.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They really aren&amp;#39;t totally incompatible with ABCT which is why I&amp;#39;m surprised more Austrians don&amp;#39;t attempt to find more in common with other perspectives.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Business Cycle Theories</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/439.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:439</guid><dc:creator>Webster</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/439.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=439</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; I saw one very interesting one in a book entitled something along the lines of &lt;i&gt;Problems in Contemporary Economics&lt;/i&gt;
from 1920 that expounded on the animal spirits approach.&amp;nbsp; Essentially,
when the economy is booming the price of expansion for businesses is
high and the benefits of expansion are low (assuming that the economy
will go into a recession in the near future).&amp;nbsp; On the other hand when
the economy is in a recession the price of expansion is low and the
benefits are high.&amp;nbsp; Consequently, once businesses expect a recession
they will cut expansion, creating a trickle-through effect that reduces
demand in all markets, causing a recession.&amp;nbsp; Once in the recession,
businesses will begin expansion as soon as they expect an expansion of
the economy, and that will trickle through and increase AD, bringing
the economy back.&amp;nbsp; He also made an argument over interest rates, but I
forgot precisely the way it worked.&amp;nbsp; I do not know enough about the Austrian theory to tell how different they are, but if you are interested I could try to get the title of the book. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Business Cycle Theories</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/432.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:15:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:432</guid><dc:creator>Inquisitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/432.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=432</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;The New Classicist &amp;quot;Real Business Cycle&amp;quot; is always a good candidate, especially given the attention it has been receiving lately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Business Cycle Theories</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:12:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:416</guid><dc:creator>earlgrey</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=416</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I have an essay idea, but in its present form it requires 3 depression or business cycle theories. I have Austrian (of course) and Keynesian (another duh), but I can&amp;#39;t come up with another that would be meaningfully different from Keynesian. I thought of Marxian, but my essay applies them to the real world, and I don&amp;#39;t think Marxian theory has enough substance to do so (correct me if I&amp;#39;m wrong). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any ideas?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>