<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Would someone please refute this piece on why QE2 isn't inflationary?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416361.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:01:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:416361</guid><dc:creator>mgdpublic</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416361.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=416361</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Ok that first thread answered the question.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Would someone please refute this piece on why QE2 isn't inflationary?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416263.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:16:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:416263</guid><dc:creator>Smiling Dave</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416263.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=416263</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	First of all, Jon Stewart had Bernanke admitting it IS money printing about a year ago, then more recently saying it is not. &lt;a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-december-7-2010/the-big-bank-theory"&gt;Youtube is your friend.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Here are links to some threads on the subject. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/20916.aspx"&gt;http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/20916.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/21020.aspx"&gt;http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/21020.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	And here: &lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/20935.aspx"&gt;http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/20935.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	And here: &lt;a href="https://mises.org/Community/forums/t/22235.aspx"&gt;https://mises.org/Community/forums/t/22235.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	And here: &lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/23286.aspx"&gt;http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/23286.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Here is a bit of wikipedia on QE. Note Step 2, which is the money printing:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;&lt;span class="mw-headline" id="Steps"&gt;Steps&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		&lt;em&gt;The central bank has previously targeted an extremely low rate of interest, near or at zero percent.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		&lt;em&gt;The central bank credits its own bank account with money it creates electronically.&lt;sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-bbcnews_9-2"&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing#cite_note-bbcnews-9"&gt;&lt;span&gt;[&lt;/span&gt;10&lt;span&gt;]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-ft.com_36-0"&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing#cite_note-ft.com-36"&gt;&lt;span&gt;[&lt;/span&gt;37&lt;span&gt;]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		&lt;em&gt;The central bank buys government bonds (including long-term government bonds) or other financial assets, from commercial banks or other financial institutions, with the newly created money.&lt;sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-bbcnews_9-3"&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing#cite_note-bbcnews-9"&gt;&lt;span&gt;[&lt;/span&gt;10&lt;span&gt;]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-ft.com_36-1"&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing#cite_note-ft.com-36"&gt;&lt;span&gt;[&lt;/span&gt;37&lt;span&gt;]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Now, Bernanke had the gall to explain that it is not money printing because no new currency is put into circulation. Meaning physical paper dollars are not run off a prining press.&amp;nbsp; But electronic dollars ARE created, and he mumbles his way through that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	And of course it is inflationary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Would someone please refute this piece on why QE2 isn't inflationary?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416202.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:20:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:416202</guid><dc:creator>Rcder</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416202.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=416202</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	According to the Austrian understanding of inflation, which is an increase in the money supply, then quantitative easing is undoubtedly inflationary.&amp;nbsp; However, as has been pointed out in other threads, this money isn&amp;#39;t being loaned out to the general public at a very high volume so the increase in prices isn&amp;#39;t that exponential.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I&amp;#39;m sure someone here has the numbers on it, but most of the money from QE2 is being kept in the national Federal Reserve bank and the regional banks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Would someone please refute this piece on why QE2 isn't inflationary?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416201.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:33:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:416201</guid><dc:creator>mgdpublic</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416201.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=416201</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	http://pragcap.com/bernanke-explains-why-qe2-is-not-money-printing-again&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I know I&amp;#39;m a bit late to the party on asking this question.&amp;nbsp; As I read it, the first thing I thought of is that banks now have cash to loan whereas they once had bonds.&amp;nbsp; That seems inflationary to me.&amp;nbsp; Is that where he&amp;#39;s wrong?&amp;nbsp; Thanks in advance!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>