<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Non-Austrian Books and Economic Studies</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416884.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:46:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:416884</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416884.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=416884</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Obviously when you use the terms &amp;quot;magnum opus&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Keyesianism&amp;quot;, most people are going to think of &lt;em&gt;The General Theory&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;nbsp; However, as the above poster pointed out, there is a difference between two...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 class="entry-header"&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.coordinationproblem.org/2011/04/on-keynesian-economics-and-the-economics-of-keynes-1.html"&gt;On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	And it has been argued that Keynes&amp;#39; views changed over the years, and he died a full decade after publishing his opus.&amp;nbsp; Samuelson&amp;#39;s &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_%28textbook%29" title="Economics (textbook)"&gt;Economics: An Introductory Analysis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp; was first published two years after Keynes&amp;#39; &lt;em&gt;General Theory&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; and was the second American textbook to explain the principles of Keynesian economics and how to think about economics...and since became the largest selling econ textbook of all time.&amp;nbsp; So that may be another you could look into...although it &lt;em&gt;is &lt;/em&gt;a textbook.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m not sure how interested you are in having to wade through that kind of thing.&amp;nbsp; And it&amp;#39;s possible something like Mankiw would be a better text for getting a grasp on the mainstream econ of toady.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	But if you&amp;#39;re going to embark on &lt;em&gt;The General Theory&lt;/em&gt;, be prepared...Have a listen to what Samuelson &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XbG6aIUlog#t=6m42s"&gt;had to say about it&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Non-Austrian Books and Economic Studies</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416822.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:52:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:416822</guid><dc:creator>pentahedron</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416822.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=416822</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Those two books do cover it for the most part. I&amp;#39;ve read MES and I&amp;#39;m working on HA right now, but MES is a textbook version of HA. Keep in mind that for things like the business cycle you would be much better off looking at works like &lt;em&gt;Time and Money&lt;/em&gt; by Roger Garrison since it&amp;#39;s more current. Overall if you want a good overview then yeah I would recommend those.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	You can also check out David Friedmans &lt;em&gt;Price Theory&lt;/em&gt; which you can get for free online:&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Price_Theory/PThy_ToC.html&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Or you can check&amp;nbsp; Mankiws intro to micro or essentials of econ books which are good. After a while you will start seeing similarties/differences between austrian and neoclassical thought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Keynes &lt;em&gt;General Theory&lt;/em&gt; is probably what you&amp;#39;re looking for if want to read into Keynesian, but keep in mind that they&amp;#39;ve had a restructing since about the 70/80s and New Keynesian is now among the mainstream school of thoughts, primarily in the macro realm. I don&amp;#39;t know about any treatises on that but I&amp;#39;m sure any intro macro textbook would do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Non-Austrian Books and Economic Studies</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416817.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:13:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:416817</guid><dc:creator>Daniel James Sanchez</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416817.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=416817</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;gibbons6817:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I&amp;#39;m going to read MES first because I&amp;#39;m very familiar with Rothbard and I like his style. &amp;nbsp;I also have the scholars&amp;rsquo; edition with Murphy&amp;#39;s study guide.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Welcome!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	In that case this would be perfect timing for you:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/24202.aspx"&gt;http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/24202.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Non-Austrian Books and Economic Studies</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416815.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:09:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:416815</guid><dc:creator>gibbons6817</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/416815.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=416815</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This is my first post and I was hoping to engage by asking some questions that I&amp;#39;ve been tirelessly trying to find answers to. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m structuring an Economics Study plan for the summer between semesters. &amp;nbsp;I have already read &amp;quot;The Law,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The Ethics of Liberty,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Economics in One Lesson,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The Case against the Fed,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;What Has Government Done to Money,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;How Capitalism Saved America&amp;quot; every Ron Paul book, and many articles on mises.org &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Now, I&amp;#39;m pretty well prepared, I think, for the big ones: &amp;quot;Man, Economy and State with Power &amp;amp; Market,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Human Action.&amp;quot; I&amp;#39;m going to read MES first because I&amp;#39;m very familiar with Rothbard and I like his style. &amp;nbsp;I also have the scholars&amp;rsquo; edition with Murphy&amp;#39;s study guide. &amp;nbsp;Then I plan on tackling &amp;quot;Human Action.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Here&amp;rsquo;s my study plan with questions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	1) I&amp;#39;ve read that these two books define the Austrian school and are the two Magnum Opus&amp;#39;. &amp;nbsp;Is this true? Do these two books cover basically everything you need to know about all Economic schools and the Austrian perspective on them?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	2) Next I&amp;#39;m going to slightly delve into the Chicago School and read two Friedman books: &amp;ldquo;Free to Choose&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;A Monetary History of the U.S.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	3) I want to then read two Keynesian books. I am having a difficult time finding the Magnum Opus of the Keynesian school. &amp;nbsp;I want to read the best of the best so that I can understand their side and better critique their arguments. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m looking for two books that would compare [in regards to what their schools put on the peddle stool] to MES and HA. &amp;nbsp;Does anyone have any recommendations? &amp;nbsp;Please only choose the top two you&amp;#39;d rank because I don&amp;#39;t have much time and am looking to complete these studies over the summer.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I have &amp;quot;The General Theory.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I figure this will give me the top 2 from the Austrian school, the top 2 from the Chicago school and then the mystery top 2 from the Keynesian school. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>