Economics Questions

Re: devaluation is good for society

banned — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:32:59 GMT

Yes what is?

Re: devaluation is good for society

martinglake — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:24:46 GMT

lol, it is, I just missed a few apostrophies:)

total road block has been reached I believe. (look you've got me saying `I believe` after everything now)

we could countinue by saying:

yes it is

no it isn't

yes it is

no it isnt

but that would be beneath us both.

just sign this piece of paper and have done with it

Re: devaluation is good for society

Jon Irenicus — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:10:33 GMT

if it happened it must have been a market phenomenon. its proof is its existance.

No. I already mentioned what a market is. This sentence does not even seem coherent.

therefore a free market must have powers in place preventing the rise of a market that is not free and in doing so the free market becomes unfree.

Yes: it's called not granting a territorial monopoly over force to a small select group, or any group for that matter...

-Jon

Re: devaluation is good for society

martinglake — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:03:36 GMT

however if it is organic then it will happen if it is not prevented from happening. yes?

if it happened it must have been a market phenomenon. its proof is its existance.

therefore a free market must have powers in place preventing the rise of a market that is not free and in doing so the free market becomes unfree.

hense what we have.

Re: devaluation is good for society

banned — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:00:58 GMT

martinglake:
well its only going to take a mathmatition to prove me wrong. are you said mathmatition?

I haven't seen you propose any mathematical functions which you would use determine your ideal society with.

Re: devaluation is good for society

Geoffrey Allan Plauché — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:59:05 GMT

banned:

Geoffrey Allan Plauche:
You keep using words, but I don't think they mean what you think they mean.

It's rather amusing :)

Has Nim Chimpsky risen from the dead? :D

Re: devaluation is good for society

Jon Irenicus — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:57:52 GMT

This isn't economics, strictly speaking. Moreso the province of political science, perhaps sociology, but of course all are subsumed under praxeology. Just because something is an organic process, of course, neither means it is a market phenomenon, nor does it even begin to justify it.

-Jon

Re: devaluation is good for society

martinglake — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:54:51 GMT

well its only going to take a mathmatition to prove me wrong. are you said mathmatition?

I think I have a general understanding wide enough to use such words, perhaps they arn't taken from an ecconomics context though.

what words are you questioning?

Re: devaluation is good for society

martinglake — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:48:18 GMT

without knowing what your talking about but knowing it was in the beginning of an economics text book, (yes I have read a page or two out of an ecconomics text book - shocking as that may seem) and considering my argument, it contains aspects of both I'd say both, and further more the creation of the state was (as everything is) an organic process that happend over time and the dotting of sentances and waving of flags was only a formal moment in the creation of that state. For example whoever drew up the plans for the state was already functioning as and aspect of the state they were about to create. I can guess that much:)

Re: devaluation is good for society

banned — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:45:19 GMT

Geoffrey Allan Plauche:
You keep using words, but I don't think they mean what you think they mean.

It's rather amusing :)

Re: devaluation is good for society

Jon Irenicus — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:44:29 GMT

Hey, maybe his first thought when he read the word "platonic" was "you wash your dirty mouth out boy!!!"

-Jon

Re: devaluation is good for society

Geoffrey Allan Plauché — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:39:53 GMT

martinglake:

my argumemt, in absense of any traction, has evolved into a totally oblique position envolving systems phenomenons and functions. it's rather amusing:)

You keep using words, but I don't think they mean what you think they mean.

Re: devaluation is good for society

martinglake — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:37:14 GMT

my argumemt, in absense of any traction, has evolved into a totally oblique position envolving systems phenomenons and functions. it's rather amusing:)

Re: devaluation is good for society

Jon Irenicus — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:31:29 GMT

So, what reading have you done on the history of the state? Endogenously or exogenously created, which would you say?

-Jon

Re: devaluation is good for society

martinglake — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:29:33 GMT

the system can do that.