<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Possibly one of the best assessments of exploitation theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/435220.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:07:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:435220</guid><dc:creator>Aristophanes</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/435220.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=435220</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	He must have meant Schumpeter had it right...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Possibly one of the best assessments of exploitation theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/435175.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 00:20:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:435175</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/435175.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=435175</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;h1 align="center"&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://lewrockwell.com/north/north1022.html"&gt;Roubini, Marx, and Keynes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align="center"&gt;
	&lt;font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3"&gt;&lt;b&gt;by &lt;a href="mailto:garynorth@garynorth.com"&gt;Gary North&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3"&gt;Nouriel Roubini, known as &amp;quot;Dr. Doom&amp;quot; &amp;ndash; having replaced Henry Kaufman in this capacity &amp;ndash; now says that Karl Marx was right, according to &lt;a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/197468/20110813/roubini-nouriel-roubini-dr-doom-financial-crisis-debt-crisis-europe.htm"&gt;a recent article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3"&gt;Roubini teaches at New York University&amp;#39;s Stern School of Business. Kaufman earned a Ph.D. at the Stern School of Business. They are both very stern fellows.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3"&gt;I can hardly blame Kaufman for being stern. He ended his career at Lehman Brothers as the chairman of the Finance and Risk Committee. He is the author of &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0470532122?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=lewrockwell&amp;amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0470532122"&gt;The Road to Financial Reformation: Warnings, Consequences, Reforms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; (2009), also known as &lt;i&gt;Do As I Say or Wind Up as We Did&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3"&gt;Dr. Roubini is from Persia, which is the Establishment&amp;#39;s term for Iran: &amp;quot;way back when and someday soon, we hope.&amp;quot;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3"&gt;We learn on Wikipedia that &amp;quot;during the administration of President Bill Clinton, he was a senior economist for the Council of Economic Advisers, later moving to the United States Treasury Department as a senior adviser to Timothy Geithner, who is now Treasury Secretary.&amp;quot; Anyone who worked for Geithner must know the man&amp;#39;s abilities. I can hardly blame Roubini for worrying about impending doom. I have the same concern.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3"&gt;On the other hand, the reasons for my concern are different from Roubini&amp;#39;s. According to a recent article, Roubini thinks Marx had things accurate.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		&lt;font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3"&gt;&amp;quot;Karl Marx had it right,&amp;quot; Roubini said in an interview with wsj.com. &amp;quot;At some point capitalism can self-destroy itself. That&amp;#39;s because you can not keep on shifting income from labor to capital without not having an excess capacity and a lack of aggregate demand. We thought that markets work. They are not working. What&amp;#39;s individually rational...is a self-destructive process.&amp;quot;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	[&lt;a href="http://lewrockwell.com/north/north1022.html"&gt;continued...&lt;/a&gt;] &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>