<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Krugman on Barro on Keynesianism</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/436177.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:08:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:436177</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/436177.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=436177</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I heard about this and it actually took me longer than I thought to find it.&amp;nbsp; Apparently this isn&amp;#39;t the first time these two had a tizzy.&amp;nbsp; All the articles that kept coming up in a search with the names &amp;quot;krugman&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;barro&amp;quot; were from 2009.&amp;nbsp; Anyway, this is from last weeK&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Barro: &amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903596904576516412073445854.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion" rel="nofollow"&gt;Keynesian Economics vs. Regular Economics&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(then &lt;a href="http://uneasymoney.com/2011/08/24/barro-on-keynesian-economics-vs-regular-economics/" rel="nofollow"&gt;David Glasner responds&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Krugman: &amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/25/irregular-economics/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Irregular Economics&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The best part is the opening paragraph of Barro: &amp;quot;What few know is that there is no meaningful theoretical or empirical support for the Keynesian position.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	And if you&amp;#39;re interested in 2009, Tyler Cowen seems to have &lt;a href="http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2009/01/dumping-on-robert-barro.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;most of the links&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>